International Digital Times
by Melissa Siegal
December 14, 2012


Nancy Lanza legally bought and owned the guns used in the Connecticut school shooting on Friday afternoon, according to NBC News.

Nancy Lanza, the mother of Adam Lanza, was killed in her home before the Connecticut school shooting took place, according to ABC News. Adam Lanza reportedly shot Nancy Lanza in the face before driving his mother's car to Sandy Hook Elementary School, according to the Associated Press.

Adam Lanza then reportedly killed 20 children and six adults at the Newtown, Connecticut school before pulling a gun on himself. Two 9mm handguns were found at the scene of the Connecticut shooting, per NBC News. Adam Lanza also reportedly brought two semi-automatic pistols and an automatic rifle to school.

This finding makes sense considering Adam Lanza was not old enough to legally own a gun in his home state. NBC News reports that Connecticut residents must be 21 or older to purchase or carry a handgun. Adam Lanza, meanwhile, was just 20 years old. However, rifle owners in the state are not required to register their weapons.

(excerpted)
http://www.idigitaltimes.com/articles/13...a-adam-guns.htm

BTW, FOLKS, there's some circumstantial evidence that the shooter in the CT school situation

fits virtually all the hallmarks of an MK-ULTRA stooge.

Don't know that I'll get to posting those tonight--working on a UFO thread. However, I was suspicious I just hadn't read of any evidence. Now I have.

He was evidently under psychiatric care . . . and some psychiatrists are essentially victimizing recruiters for stooges for MK-ULTRA ops.

Remember . . . the oligarchy has several goals here . . .

1. GETTING RID OF PRIVATE GUNS
2. CAUSING DEATH, MAYHEM, TERROR
3. WINDING UP THE POPULACE TOWARD DEMANDING MARTIAL LAW TO BE SAFE and requiring total surrender of the shreds of freedom left.

Q, I don't know what evidence that you have seen, but to me it is too early to know the truth about this. Hopefully, at some point we will (but I ain't counting on that).

To me, the most disturbing thing is that any of these questions need to be asked. Our ability to confront a tragedy like this from a purely human perspective is almost always clouded, or contaminated to some degree, owing to the healthy distrust of government that is sadly required in this day and age. It is just so painful to have to wonder:
- is this guy another (drug-up and/or mind-controlled) patsie used to create a horrific event to gin up public sentiment?
- patsie or no patsie, how quickly is the government going to use public sentiment to abolish more of our Bill of Rights protections?

I can't tell you how painful it is that any of these questions pass through my mind, unfortunately within minutes of learning about the news. Sadly we no longer have a government worthy of our trust.

Yesterday's events really threw me for a loop. Partially due to the horrific nature of that attack, and partially because of the fact that I could not even "grieve" (from afar) and process the tragedy within the spiritual realm without the pollution of thought from the above.


From book one of Matt Bracken's EFAD trilogy:

Zitat

---

In the aftermath of the stadium massacre, an outraged public demands an end to the threat posed by assault rifles, and Congress passes emergency legislation banning their private possession. American gun owners have one week to turn in their semi-automatic rifles, or face mandatory five year federal prison terms.

---

I've told Matt a number of times that he must be the most prescient writer alive today. I sit here and watch the horrors unfold almost daily; events and situations that he laid out years ago. I shudder as I wait to see how closely the events of the next days and weeks track to the short passage above.