WOW! Delusional.

I don't know if anyone has realized this, but this guy is a nobody writing in a extreme Left publication nobody reads. Could it be he is looking for attention just like Bill Mahar, Crissy Matthews and Piers Morgan who also have zero readership/viewership?

I saw this article this morning and spent a few minutes tracing the source of the so-called "FBI data" used to support the thesis that right-wing extremists were a greater threat than islamist extremists. The Slate article references an article from a sister publication, Think Progress, which uses this report from the Muslim Public Affairs Counsel as it's source document.

Keeping an open mind, I started to review the MPAC report only to learn that one of the "non-muslim" terrorists was none other than Johnny Mohamed, the DC Sniper. Another "non-muslim" terrorist was the late Dr. Bruce Ivens who was at one time suspected but never charged in the 2001 anthrax mail attacks.

While I did learn about a couple of disturbing cases where anti-government extremists were developing chemical weapons for unknown purpose, the MPAC report was clearly manipulated to overstate threat posed by non-muslims which was further manipulated by Slate to read white extremists and FBI data.