National Review Online
by Andrew C. McCarthy
May 13, 2013

With all the attention the Obama administration’s lies about the Benghazi terrorist attack are, at long last getting, an aspect of the scandal remains under-examined: the assumption that the anti-Islamic video so tirelessly touted by President Obama and his minions as the provocation causing the Benghazi violence did, in fact, cause the rioting at the U.S. embassy in Cairo hours earlier on September 11, 2012.

This conventional wisdom is wrong. There is a kernel of truth to it, which is more than you can say about the video’s connection to Benghazi, but no more than that.

(excerpted)
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/348...iro-rioting-too

Zitat

---

We know this thanks to the invaluable Raymond Ibrahim — who makes it his business to scour the Arabic press, where Islamic supremacists are actually covered. Ray published a post on it in the PJ Tatler. The post echoes my observation, from back in July, that the Blind Sheik’s son, Abdallah Abdel Rahman, was threatening to raid the U.S. embassy in Cairo and hold our people hostage to coerce his father’s release.

---

AGAIN, with the Blind Sheik ......and kidnapping for his release !!

WAS Chris Stevens suppose to be kidnapped for the release of the sheik ??

Is this why the Stand Down order was given ??

Did Oblamo expect the Ambassador to be kidnapped ............and never expected he would be killed ??

Very interesting !!