60 Minutes had an absolutely devastating report on the Obama administration’s failure to protect Ambassador Chris Stevens and other Americans in Benghazi.
I’ll post the video when available (update – available and added), but the heart of the report is that there were clear and unequivocal warnings which were ignored, and the Obama administration lied about these warnings after the attack.
Hillary and Obama blamed a video and stood by the caskets perpetuating that lie.
And remember how almost all of the media obsessed with Mitt Romney’s statement over Benghazi, and colluded to ask Romney gotcha questions while downplaying and obfuscating what really happened.
60 Minutes said its investigation took almost a year.
I guess some might say "well good, the MSM's finally coming around."
Me - I have so little trust for them I don't care what they say. Remember - everything they do is about agenda. It's not about informing. It's not about reporting the news. No - it's agenda, agenda, agenda.
Did I say it's about the agenda?
So yes - now that Zero has been re-elected, it's safe from their standpoint to go after him. He's in his second (lame duck) term - unless he declares martial law and declares himself king for life (always a possibility now that we're living in the Twilight Zone)
So if it's about the agenda - what IS the agenda? Well we can only speculate - but whatever it is, you can bet that it WON'T advance the cause of liberty and small government.
And that's all I NEED to know.
So "60 Minutes" - late to the dance - can go pound sand.
You're a brave man. Go and break through the lines. And remember, while you're out there risking your life and limb through shot and shell, we'll be in be in here thinking what a sucker you are. ~Rufus T. Firefly
Quote: Justme wrote in post #3I speculate the agenda is an attempt to gain trustworthiness for the next election they try to shove their agenda down LIV throats.
The MSM does this all the time with two purposes in mind:
1. Cover themselves with a repulsive, self-administered, "credibility" for having investigated and bravely reported the matter.
2. Pour salt in conservatives' wounds ("Neener-neener, we knew about this all along!").
Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #2I guess some might say "well good, the MSM's finally coming around."
Me - I have so little trust for them I don't care what they say. Remember - everything they do is about agenda. It's not about informing. It's not about reporting the news. No - it's agenda, agenda, agenda.
Did I say it's about the agenda?
Exactly. If they had been around in 1941,they would have been reporting the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1943 to avoid embarrassing King Franklin for being so unprepared.
To this very day nobody in the mainstream is reporting the FACT that King Franklin worked hard to sucker the Japanese into attacking so he could declare war on them and Germany in order to have an excuse to protect his lust bunny,Joe Stalin.
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
Maybe they are trying to save face. I am sure they know by now what most of the public think of them. Their ratings are chitty..especially NBC. They see Obamas polls are in the chitter. There is no reason to stick by and protect him now. Most people with a brain..didnt have to investigate for over a year to come to the conclusion they did now. We figured it out THEN. So..do they think they spilled the beans? And if they did..do they think anything different will happen? Its old news.