In his discussion of the war between conservative and moderate Republicans David Freddoso (the editor of Conservative Intelligence) is squarely on the side of the conservatives. However, he warns about a new trend:
A new trend becoming almost alarmingly mainstream among conservative activists is to find RINO-ism in every shadow. The football equivalent would be to characterize anything short of a pick-six on every play as a defensive failure. As we have noted here previously, this is a paranoid reaction to bad Republican behavior in the Bush years. The fact that the conservative base can be sold on this idea at all is the result of establishment sins as much as it is the fault of the carnival barkers currently selling it.
Ironically, that sort of hysteria can be found among certain Tea Party supporters even towards other Tea Party supporters. I said “ironically” because I have heard socially conservative Tea Party people denounce libertarians as RINOs or even as “liberals” because of their positions on social issues. They forget that the Tea Party is not a litmus test on social issues and never has been. It began as a populist libertarian movement:
Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government, and Free Markets
Ironically, that sort of hysteria can be found among certain Tea Party supporters even towards other Tea Party supporters. I said “ironically” because I have heard socially conservative Tea Party people denounce libertarians as RINOs or even as “liberals” because of their positions on social issues.
Those people aren't conservatives. They are religious fanatics who are closer to being fascists than they are conservatives because they want to dictate moral behavior using the force of law instead of ideas or philosophy.
Truthfully,the Tea Party is better off without them as they are the prime reason many conservative-leaning Libertarians refused to ever support any Republican candidate.
The Religious Police are something high on the list of "Things this country doesn't need".
Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)
This guy is trying to make connections to the past and where the Tea Party came from that are not there. The Tea Party DID start with Santelli. It didn't start with some group Koch came up with in '04. If it did start in '04, the '06 election cycle would have been much different.