Examiner.com
by Marv Dumon
January 10, 2013

On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9.

As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court's decision to review Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State.

On Feb. 15, all nine justices will hear arguments on whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void.

(excerpted)
http://www.examiner.com/article/supreme-...orged-documents

WoW!! that's unbelievable. maybe Roberts is wanting to undo his evil healthcare vote?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsyCre-YAnk

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #1

---

Examiner.com
by Marv Dumon
January 10, 2013

On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9.

As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court's decision to review Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State.

On Feb. 15, all nine justices will hear arguments on whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void.

(excerpted)
http://www.examiner.com/article/supreme-...orged-documents

---

Orly Taitz? For crying out loud. This is going to be a circus act. She is a professional whack job. She has her fingers in all sorts of tin foil hat conspiracies and other odd behaviors.

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #3

---

Orly Taitz? For crying out loud. This is going to be a circus act. She is a professional whack job. She has her fingers in all sorts of tin foil hat conspiracies and other odd behaviors.

---

Quote: ThirstyMan wrote in post #4

---

Time will tell. The trial should focus on the evidence, not ad hominem. One would hope.

---

What is the question of the case, I sure it is some legal point, not about the documents.//?/??

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #5

---

We will have our answer when we see who is arguing the case. If Orly takes off her Dentists smock and puts on her Lawyering hat, the thing is finished before it started. If you go through her list of legal cases, they are a comedy routine.

---