ZitatEach of them takes an oath to defend the Constitution, but many House lawmakers either don’t understand the founding document or don’t take its precepts seriously, according to an analysis by The Washington Times that studied the constitutional backing that representatives submitted for each of the more than 3,000 bills they introduced in 2011.
Under rules that the new Republican majority put into place, each House member introducing a bill must cite specific parts of the Constitution that they think grant Congress the authority to take the action they are proposing.
The first year’s worth of action was less than inspiring for adherents of the founding document: Many lawmakers ignored the rule, while others sliced and diced the clauses to justify what they were trying to do. One thumbed his nose at the exercise altogether, saying it’s up to the courts, not Congress, to determine what is constitutional.
ZitatThe Washington Times studied 3,764 bills introduced in the first year and found some patterns in the authority statements: The most commonly cited authority was Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, which establishes Congress‘ power to tax and spend “for the common defense and general welfare.” Close behind, however, was the commerce clause — Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 — which has come under fire by many conservatives for being stretched well beyond the Founding Founders’ intent.
Lawmakers cited 70 authorities, including 56 bills under the 10th Amendment, which reserves powers to the states rather than to Congress, and 12 under the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms.
“The thing that jumped out is how many parts of the Constitution members of Congress seem to think grant them legislative authority,” said Doug Kendall, founder of the Constitutional Accountability Center. “I wouldn’t have thought the 10th Amendment, which is about not legislating, or the First Amendment, which says ‘Congress shall make no law,’ would be fertile ground for legislative authority.”
America's hope is not the donkey or the elephant, but the Lamb.
Quote: steph wrote in post #2We have a bunch of people who are illiterate of the Constitution making laws. And we wonder why we are screwed as a country.
I don't think things can turn around until the people get educated.
There are those who are ignorant and those that pretend they are ignorant who bend the Constitution to suit their agenda. Both are equally as dangerous.
Orthodoxy SUCKS.
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them."- Galileo Galilei
The ones who know better are perhaps more dangerous because they don't care about the boundaries of the Constitution. However, we do have some pretty dumb pols in congress.
Quote: steph wrote in post #4The ones who know better are perhaps more dangerous because they don't care about the boundaries of the Constitution. However, we do have some pretty dumb pols in congress.
Hank Johnson and Sheila Jackson Lee are two of the most ignorant members of Congress that we have ever had to endure. Unfortunately they still maintain their seats and their right to craft legislation. They also vote on everything that their hearts desire.
Yes, the people deserve the government that they get when the people refuse to seriously maintain their rights and liberties. But members like Lee and Johnson can be just as destructive as a Nanny State Liberal who crafts legislation and then buys the votes of rubes like Johnson and Lee.
Orthodoxy SUCKS.
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them."- Galileo Galilei