LEAKED EMAILS PROVE OBAMA "BACKED PLAN TO LAUNCH CHEMICAL WEAPON ATTACK ON SYRIA AND BLAME IT ON ASSAD"
And the band plays on. American reminds me of a battered victim suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. Will nothing shake America out of her Obama-induced stupor?
Obama's tactics seem to emulate the al qaeda jihadists he is supporting in Syria.
This is evil. Imagine what we don't know.
Thanks to Armaros for sending this news story. He laments: "Obama brought me to a point where, contrary to how I always felt and most of us do wanting to win debates and be proven right, I am now days hope to be wrong. I hope that the story I am reading is not true as much as I despise this impostor. Your book was one of the first, if not the first series of information I was hoping to be proven wrong. Now daily I see stuff I wish turning out as some Alex Jones conspiracy or FB hoax or whatever...except the truth."
U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime' Daily Mail Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying 'the idea is approved by Washington' Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that use of chemical warfare was 'totally unacceptable' PUBLISHED: 14:16 EST, 29 January 2013 | UPDATED: 18:17 EST, 29 January 2013
Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.
A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.
War games: An explosion in the Syrian city of Homs last month. It has been now been suggested that the U.S. backed the use of chemical weapons to spur international military intervention
According to Infowars.comthe December 25 email was sent from Britam's Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.
It reads: 'Phil... We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
'We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
'They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
'Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
'Kind regards, David.'
Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to MailOnline.
Leaked: The email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor regarding a 'Washington approved' chemical attack in Syria which could be blamed on Assad's regime
It has gotten to the point where almost anything that we hear on the "news" must be processed through a filter that forces us to basically ask "how could this be actually the worst scenario possible?"
I have no documented proof (since I didn't write anything down) but as soon as I heard that back and forth months ago about the "chemical weapons" my first thought was that this regime will try and make it look like Assad's regime is using them on the "rebels." So reading an article like this is not surprising at all. Anyone with their eyes/ears even half way open has known for months that this regime has been fomenting the "revolution" in Syria as just another point of conquest in their goal of establishing the caliphate. The regimes' great friend in Turkey (Erdogan) has been angling to establish the head of the caliphate in Turkey, but he is not unopposed in that aspect, time will tell. (And yet we provide arms and support to our great NATO ally, Turkey!)
I had the same reaction when hearing the "news" about Benghazi, I knew that it was no where near what they were "telling us" what happened, and immediately suspected arms running to Syria and elsewhere (I admit that I didn't immediately assume the role of the Turks, that little tidbit came along later). It just keeps happening over and over. Just take a look at Egypt over the past two years -- what we were "told" was happening (and how "great" it all was!) and what the net result is now. Even worse, as the truth becomes clearer over the past several months, where is the hue and cry? Nothing, crickets. A few grumble about the recent decision to supply M1 Abrams and F-16s (along with billions of $$$!) but they are shouted down with statements that we have a very "complex" relationship with Egypt that can't be viewed with too fine a focus!
We have been forced to view almost everything that "happens" now through this lens: how can this be used to inflict the most damage on the US, either immediately or in the future? Because we have now watched for four years how this regime is doing precisely that, both domestically and internationally. Years ago I would have dismissed any such notion as wild-eyed and crazed, now I don't.
Quote: steph wrote in post #3He's just pure evil. I think it was Dengar01 who met him as a state senator and said that he could sense that he was evil.