You just can’t make this stuff up.
Last year the junk scientists tried to convince us that global warming means more ice.

Now they’re trying to convince us that global warming will cause less snow but more blizzards.
Huh?
The AP reported:

With scant snowfall and barren ski slopes in parts of the Midwest and Northeast the past couple of years, some scientists have pointed to global warming as the culprit.

Then when a whopper of a blizzard smacked the Northeast with more than 2 feet of snow in some places earlier this month, some of the same people again blamed global warming.

How can that be? It’s been a joke among skeptics, pointing to what seems to be a brazen contradiction.

But the answer lies in atmospheric physics. A warmer atmosphere can hold, and dump, more moisture, snow experts say. And two soon-to-be-published studies demonstrate how there can be more giant blizzards yet less snow overall each year. Projections are that that’s likely to continue with man-made global warming.

Meanwhile… Recent scientific data reveals the world stopped getting hotter 16 years ago.

Read more:http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/...-blizzards-huh/

It was The Weather Channel that named the last blizzard "Nemo". The National Weather Service does not follow this practice of naming winter storms. The Weather Channel is run by idiots whose political agenda cannot be hidden.

I'll support Global Warming when Al Gore gives up his seaside mansion..

Maybe the just do not understand the global part, Russia has had a record snw fall year.

Quote: nerd wrote in post #4

---

Maybe the just do not understand the global part, Russia has had a record snw fall year.

---