Sometimes societies just plod along, oblivious that the world is being reinvented right under their noses. In 2000, one never saw pedestrians bumping into themselves as they glued their noses to iPhones. Thirteen years later, it is almost rare to see anyone on the street who is not stumbling about, networking or texting. Yet most of us are scarcely aware of the collective effect of that odd habit repeating itself millions of times over each day, of millions of books not read, of “hellos” not offered, of brains wired to screens rather than the physical world about them. When cars once drifted into your lane, you assumed a DUI; now their drivers are most likely texting.
Cars, of course, look about the same as they did thirty years ago. But we just assume now that they almost never break down. Up until 1980 I used to see them with hoods up by the side of the road almost every five miles or so. Today, entire notions such as points, plugs, tune-ups, and carburetors have simply quietly passed away for most motorists. The old jalopy with 100,000 miles on it was junk; the new Accord with 150,000 miles has another easy 250,000 to go. The world changes while we snore.
Lazy Money
No wonder, then, most of us are still not quite aware of how vastly different the world of 2013 is from even 2008. Take interest: not long ago most Americans assumed that when they retired, their 5-7% interest rate on passbook savings would provide some sort of income. Not now. There is scarcely a 1% return. In fact, most accounts lose money. The interest is not even matching the rate of inflation. Will we soon be charged by the banks for “protecting” our deposits?
At some unspoken moment, we shrugged and silently accepted Ben Bernanke’s world, along with the thousands of ways that his Federal Reserve Board has radically changed our lives. Those at retirement age are not stepping down, not when they have a bad/worse choice of receiving no interest income or putting their life savings in the stock or bond market. Our fathers may have retired at 58; we will be lucky to quit at 70. Is there even such a thing as retirement anymore?
No wonder that unemployed young people are endlessly circling the airport with nowhere to land, given all of us old planes perpetually taxing around on the crowded runways below. To understand the effect of no, or very low, interest, think of the billions of dollars in cash that are silently transferred from those who have saved to those who have no cash. The former receive little or no interest from the banks. The latter take out mortgages or car loans at historically low interest rates.
Did the president ever mention this revolution, among his boilerplate of “millionaires and billionaires,” “pay your fair share,” and “fat cats”?
Does it really make all that much difference whether you are a doctor at 70 who religiously put away $1,000 a month for thirty years, compounded at the old interest, and planned to retire on the interest income, or a cashless state employee with a defined benefit pension plan? The one might have over $1 million in his savings account, but the other a bigger and less risky monthly payout. Suddenly the old adult advice to our children — “Save and put your money in the bank to receive interest” — is what? “Spend it now or borrow as much as you can at cheap interest”?
Them and Us
I think it was around 2009 when an entire new vocabulary entered the American popular lexicon. Where did the 1% versus the 99% come from? From where did the new financial Mason-Dixon line arise — good below $250,000 in annual family income, very bad above it? When did the 47% — or is it the 50%? — pay no federal income taxes?
At some magical point, the rich became not the successful, the skilled, the well-inherited, the lucky, or the hardworking, but “them”: the suspect, the damned even, even as the lifestyles of the rich and famous became ever more sought after.
There are not just the rich and poor any more, but now the “good rich” (e.g., athletes, rappers, Hollywood stars, Silicon Valley grandees, Democratic senators, liberal philanthropists, etc.) and the “bad rich” (e.g., oil companies, CEOs, doctors, the Koch brothers, etc.). The correct-thinking nomenklatura and the dutiful apparat versus the kulaks and enemies of the people.
The president in his State of the Union damns the “billionaires with high-powered accountants,” as a friendly Facebook pays no state or federal taxes, as a George Soros walks away with $1.2 in speculation profits (in three months, no less!) by betting against the Japanese yen, and as a Jesse Jackson, Jr. gets caught stealing from a campaign fund to buy a $43,000 Rolex (was not a $1,000 one enough?). I thought Soros at his age knew when he had made enough money?
We shrug at all this. A president who thunders to the nation that we must be on guard against the “well-off and well-connected” heads south to Palm Beach to meet his $1,000-an-hour golf pro, while Michelle and the family go west to hit the slopes at “downright mean” Aspen, where no one accepts that they’ve reached a point where they’ve made enough money, or that there was any time when it was not good to profit.
Sadly he nails it. After zer0 won it hit me that there had been a major paradigm shift. This article lays it out. Things have changed and we really didn't notice how much.
Panta rhei — “everything is in flux” — Heraclitus says. The world we knew is not the one we wake up to after a short nap. January 2009 now seems like a far-off dream, in a way that 2016 may be a nightmare.
One of the best writers. Although, we voted for these idiots, so we deserve what we get. I know people who have presumably voted for Obama (or didn't vote at all), and many have been having the worst time of it. Hard to feel sorry for them. I'm through feeling sorry for anyone who wasn't a fervent opponent of Obama's re-election.
To reiterate, we're getting exactly the piss poor governance we deserve.
WTF, I've been more angry at the dumbassed voters more than the zer0 administration because they put him and his lawless czars in office not once but twice. The first time is kind of understandable considering the hype but to reelect him? Well, it says more about the electorate than it does about the zer0 admin.
Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #6One of the best writers. Although, we voted for these idiots, so we deserve what we get. I know people who have presumably voted for Obama (or didn't vote at all), and many have been having the worst time of it. Hard to feel sorry for them. I'm through feeling sorry for anyone who wasn't a fervent opponent of Obama's re-election.
To reiterate, we're getting exactly the piss poor governance we deserve.
Quote: steph wrote in post #7WTF, I've been more angry at the dumbassed voters more than the zer0 administration because they put him and his lawless czars in office not once but twice. The first time is kind of understandable considering the hype but to reelect him? Well, it says more about the electorate than it does about the zer0 admin.
Don't forget the role corruption of the election process played in Zeros re-election. Military votes were successfully suppressed. Electronic voting has been proven to be easily hacked by college students. Numerous reports of outright fraud were not investigated. There were precincts where the statistically impossible occurred; not one vote for Romney. There were numerous reports of votes being changed before the voters eyes; always from Romney to Obama. And ... the count of over 500 voting districts has been handed over to a company in Spain run by citizens of the world with absolutely no transparency.
While election fraud happened it wasn't the main reason that 0bama was reelected. We need to be honest about that issue. It would have been closer without the voter fraud and suppression, but I honestly don't think it would have been enough to change the results.
Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #6One of the best writers. Although, we voted for these idiots, so we deserve what we get. I know people who have presumably voted for Obama (or didn't vote at all), and many have been having the worst time of it. Hard to feel sorry for them. I'm through feeling sorry for anyone who wasn't a fervent opponent of Obama's re-election.
To reiterate, we're getting exactly the piss poor governance we deserve.
Quote: steph wrote in post #7WTF, I've been more angry at the dumbassed voters more than the zer0 administration because they put him and his lawless czars in office not once but twice. The first time is kind of understandable considering the hype but to reelect him? Well, it says more about the electorate than it does about the zer0 admin.
Don't forget the role corruption of the election process played in Zeros re-election. Military votes were successfully suppressed. Electronic voting has been proven to be easily hacked by college students. Numerous reports of outright fraud were not investigated. There were precincts where the statistically impossible occurred; not one vote for Romney. There were numerous reports of votes being changed before the voters eyes; always from Romney to Obama. And ... the count of over 500 voting districts has been handed over to a company in Spain run by citizens of the world with absolutely no transparency.
He currently has a 54% approval rating. 'Nuff said.
So supposing you're right, it's clear that a majority don't give a damn. As a matter of fact, they like it.
Quote: steph wrote in post #9While election fraud happened it wasn't the main reason that 0bama was reelected. We need to be honest about that issue. It would have been closer without the voter fraud and suppression, but I honestly don't think it would have been enough to change the results.
Although IMHO the vote would have probably been close and that is very troubling, the fraud was heavily concentrated in 'key' electoral states and that quite likely tipped the balance.
Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #6One of the best writers. Although, we voted for these idiots, so we deserve what we get. I know people who have presumably voted for Obama (or didn't vote at all), and many have been having the worst time of it. Hard to feel sorry for them. I'm through feeling sorry for anyone who wasn't a fervent opponent of Obama's re-election.
To reiterate, we're getting exactly the piss poor governance we deserve.
Quote: steph wrote in post #7WTF, I've been more angry at the dumbassed voters more than the zer0 administration because they put him and his lawless czars in office not once but twice. The first time is kind of understandable considering the hype but to reelect him? Well, it says more about the electorate than it does about the zer0 admin.
Don't forget the role corruption of the election process played in Zeros re-election. Military votes were successfully suppressed. Electronic voting has been proven to be easily hacked by college students. Numerous reports of outright fraud were not investigated. There were precincts where the statistically impossible occurred; not one vote for Romney. There were numerous reports of votes being changed before the voters eyes; always from Romney to Obama. And ... the count of over 500 voting districts has been handed over to a company in Spain run by citizens of the world with absolutely no transparency.
[b]He currently has a 54% approval rating. 'Nuff said.
So supposing you're right, it's clear that a majority don't give a damn. As a matter of fact, they like it.
I take a 54% approval with a grain of salt. Who ran the poll and who was polled ? Is the poll a creation of the corrupt MSM? OTH, the fact that well over 10% of the population approves of Obama is a sad indicator of how successful Cultural Marxism has been.
The fact that no one in government with the power to do anything about voter fraud has done anything about it, is not an indicator that a large part of the populace is either aware of the extent of the fraud or comfortable with it.
Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #6One of the best writers. Although, we voted for these idiots, so we deserve what we get. I know people who have presumably voted for Obama (or didn't vote at all), and many have been having the worst time of it. Hard to feel sorry for them. I'm through feeling sorry for anyone who wasn't a fervent opponent of Obama's re-election.
To reiterate, we're getting exactly the piss poor governance we deserve.
Quote: steph wrote in post #7WTF, I've been more angry at the dumbassed voters more than the zer0 administration because they put him and his lawless czars in office not once but twice. The first time is kind of understandable considering the hype but to reelect him? Well, it says more about the electorate than it does about the zer0 admin.
Don't forget the role corruption of the election process played in Zeros re-election. Military votes were successfully suppressed. Electronic voting has been proven to be easily hacked by college students. Numerous reports of outright fraud were not investigated. There were precincts where the statistically impossible occurred; not one vote for Romney. There were numerous reports of votes being changed before the voters eyes; always from Romney to Obama. And ... the count of over 500 voting districts has been handed over to a company in Spain run by citizens of the world with absolutely no transparency.
[b]He currently has a 54% approval rating. 'Nuff said.
So supposing you're right, it's clear that a majority don't give a damn. As a matter of fact, they like it.
I take a 54% approval with a grain of salt. Who ran the poll and who was polled ? Is the poll a creation of the corrupt MSM? OTH, the fact that well over 10% of the population approves of Obama is a sad indicator of how successful Cultural Marxism has been.
The fact that no one in government with the power to do anything about voter fraud has done anything about it, is not an indicator that a large part of the populace is either aware of the extent of the fraud or comfortable with it.
No where in the founding documents does it say and you will run the government by polls. The polls during the revolution were probably for the british. Polls are really anti representative government. And more pure democracy, three men voting on what to do with the two women.
Quote: nerd wrote in post #14No where in the founding documents does it say and you will run the government by polls. The polls during the revolution were probably for the british. Polls are really anti representative government. And more pure democracy, three men voting on what to do with the two women.
RIGHT'S RIGHT 
Print view
Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:38 pm
reply
