The simple story — cops yawn when burly white vigilante stalks and kills unarmed African-American child for the "crime" of walking while black — shocked the conscience of much of the nation a year ago and touched off an explosion of indignant demagoguery. ------ On one side were those who believed the story illustrated the evils of racism and firearms as well as the deference law enforcement affords white people.
On the other side were those who believed that Zimmerman, whose mother is Hispanic, acted in self defense, and that his arrest a month and a half after the incident in the face of mounting public pressure illustrated the perils of mob rule. ------ Physical evidence — from the wounds Zimmerman suffered to the ballistics report that indicates Zimmerman was on the ground when he fired his gun up into Martin's chest — indicates Martin was getting the better of Zimmerman in the fight that preceded the shooting.
Who started the fight? That question is at the heart of the case for or against Zimmerman, and though "Intermediate Range" doesn't answer the question, it defines it with particular clarity.
And it explains why those who've now been howling for Zimmerman's hide for the better part of a year should brace themselves for jurors to find reasonable doubt as to his guilt and for certain sad mysteries to endure.
The media first called Zimmerman a "White" based on his name. Then they willfully created the new race category of "White Hispanic" so that they could stick him with the label of racist. Without the word "white" the charges had no "merit" in furthering the leftist media's desired racist mantra.
Zimmerman deserves a huge monetary settlement from all the media outlets guilty of a mindless rush to judgment.
. . And suddenly the world turned asymmetrical. There were no longer any battle fronts. It was every man for himself.
Quote: Olivia wrote in post #5Not sure what you mean...WTF..
Me too
I believe he means that the author is trolling for a response.
Orthodoxy SUCKS.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual." Thomas Jefferson