How many 'jihadist' will come to N.Y. to help out an old friend?

Zitat

---

He is an unlawful enemy combatant, captured on foreign soil while engaged in hostilities against the United States. He belongs in the military justice system and detention facility established by Congress in accordance with the Constitution and the Supreme Court. Yet President Barack Obama has brought Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, son-in-law of Osama bin Laden, to face a civilian trial on U.S. soil in federal court in New York City.

In so doing, President Obama has defied the express will of Congress, which already refused to transfer foreign terror suspects from the Guantánamo Bay prison to the U.S. at the beginning of Obama’s first term. The decision to bring Abu Ghaith to New York is just the latest in a series of executive actions taken by President Obama that contradict the explicit intent of the legislature. It is also an action in pursuit of a policy doomed to fail.

---

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/...Law-to-New-York

Nice signature !!

Quote: W-Girl wrote in post #2

---

Nice signature !!

---

Awhhhhhh, your "messing around" is appreciated !!

How did you do that ?? That is so cute !!

Thank you !!

Quote: freeperjohn wrote in post #1

---

How many 'jihadist' will come to N.Y. to help out an old friend?

Zitat

---

He is an unlawful enemy combatant, captured on foreign soil while engaged in hostilities against the United States. He belongs in the military justice system and detention facility established by Congress in accordance with the Constitution and the Supreme Court. Yet President Barack Obama has brought Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, son-in-law of Osama bin Laden, to face a civilian trial on U.S. soil in federal court in New York City.

In so doing, President Obama has defied the express will of Congress, which already refused to transfer foreign terror suspects from the Guantánamo Bay prison to the U.S. at the beginning of Obama’s first term. The decision to bring Abu Ghaith to New York is just the latest in a series of executive actions taken by President Obama that contradict the explicit intent of the legislature. It is also an action in pursuit of a policy doomed to fail.

---

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/...Law-to-New-York

---

ABSOLUTELY INDEED.

MORE MISDIRECTING KABUKI DANCES.

MORE INCREMENTAL DICTATORIAL EMPERIAL POWER GRABS.

MORE DANCE STEPS FROM HELL.

MORE COMPLICIT SILENCE AND COOPERATION BY THE "PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVES." LOLOLOL

[cue the witches cackles echoing down the long dark hot halls of hell].

Obama & Eric Holder, the most corrupt man to ever be in charge of our Justice Department, is determined to hold terrorist trials in civilian court.
I'd like to know what their argument is concerning this situation. How can they justify endangering the residents of New York or anywhere else for a publicity trial that is sure to have repercussions?