Quote: nerd wrote in post #7.the case will be about z getting out of the car after the cop told him to wait, it is also aginst neighborhood watch rules
The crazy that says he was wrong simply being there is ...crazy.
Duh who is charged and who is going to jail. You over look what started the whole thing, some one playing cop. And i did not say his getting out of the car was illegal, i said, he had no legal reason. Big difference.
Duh?? Really?
The survivor of an attack is in prison at the moment. Not until racism showed its ugly head were there charges even brought and the FBI has already concluded no hate crime to charge him with. Bringing back the point of the op, which you decided doesn't matter. The lies of Crump and DeeDee show the lies of Trayvons camp needed to convince people somehow his getting out of his car in his neighbors is akin to criminal behavior.
They will be trying the case in florida, not here. So do you want say what may happened there or what you feel, what i said was her statment was after the fact, it is not admissable. You are mingling the facts. His getting out of his car has not been called criminal behavior.
I am not a republican I am a conservative, and supporter of the rule of law. And refuse to support any of Roves dopes.
Quote: nerd wrote in post #16 They will be trying the case in florida, not here. So do you want say what may happened there or what you feel, what i said was her statment was after the fact, it is not admissable. You are mingling the facts. His getting out of his car has not been called criminal behavior.
You're a piece of work.
You decide his leaving his car will be the issue as it was not legal but not illegal and not criminal behavior. But it's me mingling facts?
The op is about DeeDee's statements, prior to the shooting, being false. He is not being charge with second degree walking away from vehicle.
That false statement is what the prosecution wanted you to believe as well as the Martin defense.
Quote: nerd wrote in post #16 They will be trying the case in florida, not here. So do you want say what may happened there or what you feel, what i said was her statment was after the fact, it is not admissable. You are mingling the facts. His getting out of his car has not been called criminal behavior.
You're a piece of work.
You decide his leaving his car will be the issue as it was not legal but not illegal and not criminal behavior. But it's me mingling facts?
The op is about DeeDee's statements, prior to the shooting, being false. He is not being charge with second degree walking away from vehicle.
That false statement is what the prosecution wanted you to believe as well as the Martin defense.
Funny, if he had stayed in his car and gone home, nothing would have happened, that is what the jury will hear, over and over again. The lie about her age will not be introduced. I did not decide anything, i am telling you will happen in court.
I am not a republican I am a conservative, and supporter of the rule of law. And refuse to support any of Roves dopes.
Quote: nerd wrote in post #18 Funny, if he had stayed in his car and gone home, nothing would have happened, that is what the jury will hear, over and over again. The lie about her age will not be introduced. I did not decide anything, i am telling you will happen in court.
Ok, I understand now. With this post you point out the obvious.
The issue at hand for you is you being right. You got it
So what? They'll hear lot more as well. For example, if Trayvon hadn't jumped him nothing would have happened.
Quote: nerd wrote in post #7.the case will be about z getting out of the car after the cop told him to wait, it is also aginst neighborhood watch rules
It took me forever to find this. Your info is not accurate.