RUSH: If Left To Vote Of The People Same-Sex Marriage Loses, Why Would GOP Support It?

Thought to be decided at the state level. Put it to a vote. Odds are, without voter fraud, despite cultural marxism's inroads, us "country class" would defeat it in most, if not all, states. The "ruling class', who presume to know better than us can't have that.


Edit: Thought = This ought

Looks what's happened in California. The people have voted no several times but it's still an issue.
I wouldn't be the least surprised if the court doesn't rule it's unconstitutional to deny them their "rights."

Quote: Olivia wrote in post #3

---

Looks what's happened in California. The people have voted no several times but it's still an issue.
I wouldn't be the least surprised if the court doesn't rule it's unconstitutional to deny them their "rights."

---

I half agree with Rush here. I personally don't have a problem with gay marriage, I don't feel it's an important issue however, the supreme court should be following the will of the people and not ruling from the bench.

So what what issue do the Liberals ever give up on-Answer is none-why you ask it is because of republicans like you cedric who are not willing to fight because they are too much of a coward to stand in the face of name calling and presure of oh that looks bad crap--that's what he means by the issue is lost because the republicans are not willing to take up the cause of tradional marrage or morality--you Know just stay with the go a long to get a long RINO mentality--it's a lost battle if you don't see it than a Karl Rove republican perfectly fits you

Again read into it what you wish like you did Rush and everybody who disagrees with the cowardly RINO's--just cherry pick to fit a desired result

It's Good Friday gentlemen, let's put aside our differences until Monday. (Just a thought.)






(Enough emoticons for all!)

Thank you for the reminder FP123-- I'm done

Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #5

---

I half agree with Rush here. I personally don't have a problem with gay marriage, I don't feel it's an important issue however, the supreme court should be following the will of the people and not ruling from the bench.

---

Quote: truth_seeker wrote in post #14

---

Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #5

---

I half agree with Rush here. I personally don't have a problem with gay marriage, I don't feel it's an important issue however, the supreme court should be following the will of the people and not ruling from the bench.

---

The Supreme Court should not be following the will of the people. That is the job of the elected representatives.

If the people direct their representatives to oppose same-sex marriage, then they should do so.

But if the Supreme Court is then asked to determine if "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are denied to certain classes, it is a fair question for the court.

---

Zitat

---

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

---

Without voter fraud, and even with political correctness, I doubt many, if any, states would approve gay marriage.