April 23, 2013
Tsarnaev the Fraud
By Jan LaRue

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should be tried by a military commission at Guantanamo Bay rather than in U.S. federal court on charges related to the Boston Marathon bombing. Naturalized American citizenship obtained by fraud is revocable.

There is Supreme Court precedent for revoking naturalized citizenship based on swearing a false oath of allegiance. SeeKnauer v. United States (1946); Perez v. Brownell ("Of course, naturalization unlawfully procured can be set aside."); and Fedorenko v. United States.

Moreover, during WWII, a German soldier who claimed naturalized U.S. citizenship but had gone back to Germany changed into civilian clothes after landing on U.S. soil from a German submarine with the intent of engaging in espionage and sabotage. The Supreme Court held in Ex Parte Quirin, that his claim of American citizenship and the right to trial in civil court was irrelevant to his confinement in a military brig as an unlawful belligerent in violation of the rules of war.

Back in the day, The New York Times opined that a military tribunal was the fitting venue for the Americans charged with conspiring to assassinate Abraham Lincoln. And so they were.

So far, the Obama administration hasn't announced when or where charges will be filed. The odds are that it will be a prolonged and costly civil trial in federal court with threats and disruptions to the city where a civil trial is held.

Seven months after becoming a U.S. citizen on Sept. 11, 2012, Tsarnaev faces charges of committing terrorist acts against "his" country, in addition to murder, mayhem, and numerous other felonies.

Are we to believe that it was after swearing his oath of "true faith and allegiance to the United States of America" not one year ago, that "Dzhokhar the Innocent" was brainwashed and provoked by his older brother, Tamerlan, into murdering, maiming and terrorizing fellow Americans?

More likely, the bombing was planned prior to Tsarnaev becoming a "citizen." He sought the privileges of citizenship to have an advantage in the event that he was captured and prosecuted.

Both Mother Jones.com and Forbes.com report that Tsarnaev maintained the Twitter account identified as "J_star." Consider his anti-American tweets prior to taking the oath of citizenship:

Just seven months before becoming naturalized Jahar @J_tsar posted on March 14, 2012, "a decade in America and I want out." There aren't any posts indicating a change of heart.

Ten days before swearing his "allegiance" to the U.S., Jahar @J_tsar tweeted on Sept. 1, 2012 came out as a "truther":

"Idk why it's hard for many of you to accept that 9/11 was an inside job, I mean I guess [f***] the facts y'all are some real #patriots#gethip.

Seven months after swearing allegiance to the United States, Tsarnaev lies in a Boston hospital with bullet holes from a gunfight with police who pulled him from a boat in a backyard where he was hiding. Eyewitnesses and videotapes link his cowardly terrorist acts from the bullets on Friday to the bombs in Boston on Monday.

Read more:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/t...l#ixzz2RK4NC6uO

Actually they need to try him and shoot him just before they try and shoot the FBI agents that let this happen and also whoever approved his paper work. There was never any proof of their asylum request.

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #3

---

Quote: nerd wrote in post #2

---

Actually they need to...shoot the FBI agents....

---

"I am a conservative, and supporter of the rule of law."
Nerd

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #6

---

Quote: nerd wrote in post #4

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #3

---

Quote: nerd wrote in post #2

---

Actually they need to...shoot the FBI agents...and also whoever approved his paper work.

---

"I am a conservative, and supporter of the rule of law."
Nerd

---

Dirty cops not doing their jobs....

---

So, someone should just shoot 'em, plus whoever approved the paper work, right, Mr. Supporter Of The Rule Of Law?

---

I am leary of letting the Feds play games with citizenship. We already see how a Marxist Regime disregards civil liberties whenever it suits them. Why peel away one more layer of protection we have from these thugs? I also don't see how a military trial will be any better. We have the Ft Hood terrorist dragging out his trial forever on just facial hair.

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #7

---

I am leary of letting the Feds play games with citizenship. We already see how a Marxist Regime disregards civil liberties whenever it suits them. Why peel away one more layer of protection we have from these thugs? I also don't see how a military trial will be any better. We have the Ft Hood terrorist dragging out his trial forever on just facial hair.

---

Quote: truth_seeker wrote in post #9

---

It isn't really about which court he' charged in, but rather whether we still even have enough national sanity and survival instinct?

At the time of WWII we still could win a world war on two fronts, spanning most continents of the globe. In 4.5 years. And the losers stayed down, defeated, to live in peace and prosperity.

And for decades BOTH political parties followed the same general foreign policy, and defeated the USSR in the Cold War.

Today it seems 180 degrees opposite. We now require 9.5 years to bring bin Laden to justice. We remain undecided how to fight, when to fight, to fight hard or gentle. Our allies must be confused, but our enemies are thrilled, emboldened by our indecisiveness.

We should not be surprised by this episode or by Hassan. It could have been predicted, and was in fact the plan for the muslim terrorists.

---