RIGHT'S RIGHT
»
Politics:
»
General Political News
»
Dem Rep. on Benghazi Talking Points: 'It Was Scrubbed ... It Was False Information. There's No Excuse For That.'
Democratic congressman Stephen Lynch said this morning on TV that Susan Rice used "scrubbed" talking points on Benghazi to deliver "false information" to the American people:
Quote: Heisenberg wrote in post #1Democratic congressman Stephen Lynch said this morning on TV that Susan Rice used "scrubbed" talking points on Benghazi to deliver "false information" to the American people:
Wanted to add a little more here Heis (mod) Please don't send me away!
Those 'Right-Winger' Nut Jobs Are At It Again ... Huh?
ZitatCongressional Democrats on Sunday distanced themselves from the Obama administration’s explanation of the Benghazi, Libya, attacks in the immediate aftermath of the fatal strikes, amid mounting evidence that suggests the information was revised to intentionally mislead Americans.
The original explanation of the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the U.S. outpost in Benghazi, Libya, was written by CIA officials, then revised by State Department and White House officials, according to news reports and witness testimony made available to Fox News.
Removed from the CIA's so-called talking points were references to “Islamic extremists” and Al Qaeda in Libya And five days later, Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, made the Sunday talk show rounds to say the attacks were, in fact, “demonstrations” sparked by protests in Egypt over an anti-Islamic video on YouTube.
However, the video is never mentioned in the numerous talking-points drafts, according to a Weekly Standard story last week, based in part on a 43-page House report and records of official emails.
“Well, it was scrubbed,” Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Steve Lynch told “Fox News Sunday.” “It was totally inaccurate. There's no excuse for that. It was false information.
Lynch also acknowledged the talking points were likely revised to reflect President Obama’s decry – with his re-election bid in the balance -- that “Al Qaeda is on the run.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/.../#ixzz2ST9ePUl9 "Congressional Democrats on Sunday distanced themselves from the Obama administration’s explanation of the Benghazi, Libya, attacks in the immediate aftermath of the fatal strikes, amid mounting evidence that suggests the information was revised to intentionally mislead Americans."
That's unbelievable! We knew it was true from the beginning. Romney tried to make political capital out of the botched up fiasco. He got nowhere. Now it is safe for the Democrats to admit the obvious, so they fess up.
No big deal, right? This happened a long long time ago.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2013/01...uot_300411.html "Senator Ron Johnson pressed the outgoing Secretary of State for an answer as to how her department and the White House came to declare that the attack erupted spontaneously from a protest outside the consulate when State could see in real time that there wasn’t any such protest under way. A clearly exasperated Clinton shot back, “What difference does it make?”
And they all walked away....
It makes a HUGE difference! Four dead and all she can say is “What difference does it make?”
We just don't get it. We're being lied to and we don't care. Wait for the facts, wait for the facts, wait for the facts.....ok you're all asleep now. We lied, no big deal.
And we accept this from our leaders? Why because they're liberals? That's all it takes to get a pass on accountability?
This is so WRONG!!!
"The Republican Party doesn't demonize prosperity. We celebrate success in our party," he said. "And let me be clear, if Republican leaders want to join this president in demonizing success and disparaging conservative values, then they're not going to be fit to be our nominee."