The Washington Examiner
by Joel Gehrke
May 14, 2013

“You’ll have to take my word for it,” said a spokesperson for the most transparent administration in history when reporters asked her to substantiate her claim that the CIA removed references to terrorists from the Benghazi talking points before the State Department ever saw them.

(excerpted)
http://washingtonexaminer.com/state-depa...article/2529622

Time to start arresting people.

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #2

---

Time to start arresting people.

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #3

---

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #2

---

Time to start arresting people.

---

Holder wasn't removed after Fast and Furious.

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #3

---

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #2

---

Time to start arresting people.

---

Holder wasn't removed after Fast and Furious.

---

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #4

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #3

---

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #2

---

Time to start arresting people.

---

Holder wasn't removed after Fast and Furious.

---

I know, he should have been. But I also realize what we should be doing, and what is really happening are two different things in our world gone mad.

---

Zitat

---

“You’ll have to take my word for it,” said a spokesperson for the most transparent administration in history when reporters asked her to substantiate her claim that the CIA removed references to terrorists from the Benghazi talking points before the State Department ever saw them.

---

the words 'I have a bridge to sell you' come to mind.

Zitat

---

All right,” Psaki replied. “Well, you’ll have to take my word for it, or I believe that email may have been public. But the larger point here, Brad, is that this is an ongoing investigation. I know that you’d like to see some results of that, as many people would. The President and the secretary, their counterparts and partners in the intel community, are very focused on that.”

At which point, one of the press corps snarked, “Is there a statute of limitations on this investigation, or does it end in January 22nd, 2016, or something?”

---

I love it !!

Quote: W-Girl wrote in post #8

---

Zitat

---

...

At which point, one of the press corps snarked, “Is there a statute of limitations on this investigation, or does it end in January 22nd, 2016, or something?”

---

I love it !!

---

That's great! I wonder if whoever it was can look forward to an audit in their immediate future?

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #9

---

I wonder if whoever it was can look forward to an audit in their immediate future?

---