Quote: FP123 wrote in post #13

---

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #12

---

Quote: freeperjohn wrote in post #4

---

Why doesn't anyone take the cryin man with the stained yellow sheets to the Woodshed!?

---

Because he's the one that controls the woodshed.

You can bet political pressure is being applied with a heavy hand this weekend to get as many of those 70 back under control as possible. The RNC is doing everything from threatening to defund projects in their districts to supporting an opponent in their next elections to get them in line.

---

And some people wonder why they are absolutely loathed and despised by Constitutional Americans -- that is the reason. Boehner and his "leadership" team are the scum of the Earth. (With apologies to natural scum.)

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #15

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #13

---

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #12

---

Quote: freeperjohn wrote in post #4

---

Why doesn't anyone take the cryin man with the stained yellow sheets to the Woodshed!?

---

Because he's the one that controls the woodshed.

You can bet political pressure is being applied with a heavy hand this weekend to get as many of those 70 back under control as possible. The RNC is doing everything from threatening to defund projects in their districts to supporting an opponent in their next elections to get them in line.

---

And some people wonder why they are absolutely loathed and despised by Constitutional Americans -- that is the reason. Boehner and his "leadership" team are the scum of the Earth. (With apologies to natural scum.)

---

FP123,

Pete made an unfounded claim, absent any proof, whatsoever, then you assumed it to be true and amped it up by using it as a basis to call people "scum".

Is that the way it works around here?

---

Quote: Justme wrote in post #18

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #15

---

FP123,

Pete made an unfounded claim, absent any proof, whatsoever, then you assumed it to be true and amped it up by using it as a basis to call people "scum".

Is that the way it works around here?

---

Just look at the Blaze title. Risking their careers? . MB isn't even running again

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #21

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #19

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #15

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #13

---

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #12

---

Quote: freeperjohn wrote in post #4

---

Why doesn't anyone take the cryin man with the stained yellow sheets to the Woodshed!?

---

Because he's the one that controls the woodshed.

You can bet political pressure is being applied with a heavy hand this weekend to get as many of those 70 back under control as possible. The RNC is doing everything from threatening to defund projects in their districts to supporting an opponent in their next elections to get them in line.

---

And some people wonder why they are absolutely loathed and despised by Constitutional Americans -- that is the reason. Boehner and his "leadership" team are the scum of the Earth. (With apologies to natural scum.)

---

FP123,

Pete made an unfounded claim, absent any proof, whatsoever, then you assumed it to be true and amped it up by using it as a basis to call people "scum".

Is that the way it works around here?

---

They have a well documented track record of doing just that - I suspect Pete's claim is right on the mark.

---

Please provide the relevant "documentation".

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #22

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #21

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #19

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #15

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #13

---

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #12

---

Quote: freeperjohn wrote in post #4

---

Why doesn't anyone take the cryin man with the stained yellow sheets to the Woodshed!?

---

Because he's the one that controls the woodshed.

You can bet political pressure is being applied with a heavy hand this weekend to get as many of those 70 back under control as possible. The RNC is doing everything from threatening to defund projects in their districts to supporting an opponent in their next elections to get them in line.

---

And some people wonder why they are absolutely loathed and despised by Constitutional Americans -- that is the reason. Boehner and his "leadership" team are the scum of the Earth. (With apologies to natural scum.)

---

FP123,

Pete made an unfounded claim, absent any proof, whatsoever, then you assumed it to be true and amped it up by using it as a basis to call people "scum".

Is that the way it works around here?

---

They have a well documented track record of doing just that - I suspect Pete's claim is right on the mark.

---

Please provide the relevant "documentation".

---

Use the safest search engine that you trust to find it - check out the backstories around the "potential" challenge for the speakership at the start of this current Congress, check also for the budget bill approving the tax hikes. I remember what I read and heard in the past, but I don't save everything and am certainly not going to do your searching! And keep yours eyes and ears open over the next week, you'll see and hear plenty if you look for it!

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #24

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #22

---

Use the safest search engine that you trust to find it - check out the backstories around the "potential" challenge for the speakership at the start of this current Congress, check also for the budget bill approving the tax hikes. I remember what I read and heard in the past, but I don't save everything and am certainly not going to do your searching! And keep yours eyes and ears open over the next week, you'll see and hear plenty if you look for it!

---

That's not how it works, FP.

You made the accusation, it's up to you to provide the proof.

Because you've failed to do so, your reckless claims are, hereby, rejected.

Edit: Not surprisingly, algernon doesn't like it when scurrilous claims are rejected for lack of proof.

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #25

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #24

---

Quote: FP123 wrote in post #22

---

Use the safest search engine that you trust to find it - check out the backstories around the "potential" challenge for the speakership at the start of this current Congress, check also for the budget bill approving the tax hikes. I remember what I read and heard in the past, but I don't save everything and am certainly not going to do your searching! And keep yours eyes and ears open over the next week, you'll see and hear plenty if you look for it!

---

That's not how it works, FP.

You made the accusation, it's up to you to provide the proof.

Because you've failed to do so, your reckless claims are, hereby, rejected.

Edit: Not surprisingly, algernon doesn't like it when scurrilous claims are rejected for lack of proof.

---

You know me better than that, I could care less what you or anyone else thinks about that. Believe what you wish, I really don't care.

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #28

---

Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #26

---

Ah . . . I see once again our resident troll has highjacked a thread not to its liking.

---

Speaking of trolls, if you were not a Leftist operative, sent to this site to demoralize conservatives with an endless stream of negativity and hoplessness,
how would you behave differently?

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #17

---

Just a gentle reminder:

If and when the immigration bill comes to a vote, the vast majority of Republicans will vote against it and the vast majority of Democrats will vote for it.

---