You can bet your last dollar the lapdog media won’t call him on this.
Via Guardian:
Top secret documents submitted to the court that oversees surveillance by US intelligence agencies show the judges have signed off on broad orders which allow the NSA to make use of information “inadvertently” collected from domestic US communications without a warrant.
The Guardian is publishing in full two documents submitted to the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (known as the Fisa court), signed by Attorney General Eric Holder and stamped 29 July 2009. They detail the procedures the NSA is required to follow to target “non-US persons” under its foreign intelligence powers and what the agency does to minimize data collected on US citizens and residents in the course of that surveillance.
The documents show that even under authorities governing the collection of foreign intelligence from foreign targets, US communications can still be collected, retained and used.
The procedures cover only part of the NSA’s surveillance of domestic US communications. The bulk collection of domestic call records, as first revealed by the Guardian earlier this month, takes place under rolling court orders issued on the basis of a legal interpretation of a different authority, section 215 of the Patriot Act.
The Fisa court’s oversight role has been referenced many times by Barack Obama and senior intelligence officials as they have sought to reassure the public about surveillance, but the procedures approved by the court have never before been publicly disclosed.
The top secret documents published today detail the circumstances in which data collected on US persons under the foreign intelligence authority must be destroyed, extensive steps analysts must take to try to check targets are outside the US, and reveals how US call records are used to help remove US citizens and residents from data collection.
However, alongside those provisions, the Fisa court-approved policies allow the NSA to:
• Keep data that could potentially contain details of US persons for up to five years;
• Retain and make use of “inadvertently acquired” domestic communications if they contain usable intelligence, information on criminal activity, threat of harm to people or property, are encrypted, or are believed to contain any information relevant to cybersecurity;
• Preserve “foreign intelligence information” contained within attorney-client communications;
• Access the content of communications gathered from “U.S. based machine[s]” or phone numbers in order to establish if targets are located in the US, for the purposes of ceasing further surveillance.
The broad scope of the court orders, and the nature of the procedures set out in the documents, appear to clash with assurances from President Obama and senior intelligence officials that the NSA could not access Americans’ call or email information without warrants.
The documents also show that discretion as to who is actually targeted under the NSA’s foreign surveillance powers lies directly with its own analysts, without recourse to courts or superiors – though a percentage of targeting decisions are reviewed by internal audit teams on a regular basis.
Is this the real USA ? Most people don't get it, understand it or even care. Thank God for this forum. I was getting fired up on Facebook there for awhile and I think even some relatives were starting to delete me.. LOL
When you try to talk to people who think they have a different set of facts than you have, they try to make you feel like dumb.. you know
Quote: se_ohio_conservative wrote in post #3Is this the real USA ? Most people don't get it, understand it or even care. Thank God for this forum. I was getting fired up on Facebook there for awhile and I think even some relatives were starting to delete me.. LOL
When you try to talk to people who think they have a different set of facts than you have, they try to make you feel like dumb.. you know
I feel for you.
What I find even more disheartening is when I mention something about the government and the listener has no idea what I am talking about because they are not curious about current events or their government's actions.
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual." Thomas Jefferson
"If people can’t trust not only the executive branch but also don’t trust Congress, and don’t trust federal judges, to make sure that we’re abiding by the Constitution with due process and rule of law, then we’re going to have some problems here." - Barack Obama, June 7, 2013
Quote: se_ohio_conservative wrote in post #3Is this the real USA ? Most people don't get it, understand it or even care. Thank God for this forum. I was getting fired up on Facebook there for awhile and I think even some relatives were starting to delete me.. LOL
When you try to talk to people who think they have a different set of facts than you have, they try to make you feel like dumb.. you know
I feel for you.
What I find even more disheartening is when I mention something about the government and the listener has no idea what I am talking about because they are not curious about current events or their government's actions.
And then they hunt up a link from Huffington post to show you the "real" facts.