Which would explain some of her behavior in court.

Via TSM:

Years before they would endure a televised pummeling in the Florida courtroom of Judge Debra Nelson, the two lawyers representing accused murderer George Zimmerman actually donated money to the prickly jurist’s first election campaign, records show.

In 1999, Republican Governor Jeb Bush appointed Nelson, a lifelong Democrat, to fill a vacancy in the 18th Judicial Circuit (covering Seminole and Brevard counties). When Nelson ran the following year for a full six-year term, she donated 85 percent of her campaign’s $151,000 war chest.

Keep reading…http://weaselzippers.us/2013/07/12/zimme...-long-democrat/

Good post.

Its really starting to look like poor Zimmerman hasn't got a prayer of a truly fair trial with an impartial judge and jury. His fate has become a political tool -- and a travesty of justice.

Zitat

---

n 1999, Republican Governor Jeb Bush appointed Nelson, a lifelong Democrat,

---

Bush's are always good for pulling this crap. The Bush appointee that ran the IRS while it was screwing Conservatives is a Rat too.

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #3

---

Zitat

---

n 1999, Republican Governor Jeb Bush appointed Nelson, a lifelong Democrat,

---

Bush's are always good for pulling this crap. The Bush appointee that ran the IRS while it was screwing Conservatives is a Rat too.

---

Of course. The Bush Crime Family are all northeastern elites,and only "became" Republicans when they needed to run as a Republican to get elected. It was about obtaining public office and power,not political convictions.

They are back in court .....jury has a question on ...if there is an evidence list ??????

Can any of the lawyers here tell me why the prosecution got to end this thing with their flimsy rebuttal? As far as I knew, the defense got the last word.

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #6

---

Can any of the lawyers here tell me why the prosecution got to end this thing with their flimsy rebuttal? As far as I knew, the defense got the last word.

---

Quote: W-Girl wrote in post #7

---

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #6

---

Can any of the lawyers here tell me why the prosecution got to end this thing with their flimsy rebuttal? As far as I knew, the defense got the last word.

---

The prosecution always has the last stab at it ....after the defense has had their time. Is that what your question is ??

---

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #8

---

Quote: W-Girl wrote in post #7

---

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #6

---

Can any of the lawyers here tell me why the prosecution got to end this thing with their flimsy rebuttal? As far as I knew, the defense got the last word.

---

The prosecution always has the last stab at it ....after the defense has had their time. Is that what your question is ??

---

Then why didn't the prosecution go last and avoid this stupid rebuttal.

---