Forum - RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win

RIGHT'S RIGHT � Politics: � General Political News � Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win

Page 3 of 4 � Page 1 2 3 4 Page �

Topic settings

Print view

Jump to forum

Welcome Wagon Board Rules Introduce Yourself Politics: King Obama Breaking News General Political News What's Right With Politics What's Wrong With Politics History and Political Philosophies Founding Documents Discussions General News Breaking News General News Business/Economy International News Crime Beat Quirky News The Media Should Be Ashamed.... Sports talk Welcome to RR Suggestions and Updates

#31 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:35 pm

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #27

Allow me to repeat what I wrote WITH EMPHASIS: Homosexuals to whom homosexual marriage is the number one issue, ..... ...... and others are probably never going to vote for a republican -

I'm sorry you missed that part.

I did NOT miss that part.

Why would you think that being a fiscal conservative or being a foreign policy conservative or being a Republican or being Cuban-American means that Florida Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen is duty-bound to oppose whether or not the State of Florida wants to allow Adam to get half of Steve's stuff plus alimony if they split up?

To a Cuban Catholic, whether or not Adam and Steve would be truly "married" is up to the Catholic Church to decide (The answer is, "No, Adam and Steve are not really marrtied in the eyes of the Catholic Church") so why drag the Bible and religion into a tax rights and inheritance rights issue between Andam and Steve and the State of Florida like those Bible Belt Protestants do?

Zitat
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-10-06/news/sfl-gay-marriage-ros-lehtinen-20111006_1_ros-lehtinen-marriage-act-doma

Religious group rips Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen for support of gay marriage

October 6, 2011|By Anthony Man, Sun Sentinel

The religious right is going after a popular South Florida congresswoman.

It�s not the one you�re thinking.

The Christian Family Coalition excoriated U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen on Thursday:

Florida Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R) has embarrassed and ridiculed herself by tragically becoming the first Republican to co-sponsor on a socially destructive and totally undemocratic bill to repeal the bipartisan Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that respects marriage at the Federal level.

If the State of Florida ever wants to declare Adam and Steve "married", why should the Republican Party in Florida be forced to champion the cause of Alabama Bible-Thumpers?

Whatever happened to the Tenth Amendment? As Governor Rick Perry pointed out in the debates, whatever Texas decides to do in regards to gay marriage is none of Massachusetts' business and whatever Massachusetts decides to do in regards to gay marriage is none of Texas' business. For that, the religious Right crucified Perry in the GOP Primaries just like they want to crucify Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. As a result, come the general election, even Mitt Romney is hurt by the GOP "brand" that has left the majority of voters in America believing that the GOP is the party that wants to control sex.

Back in 1953, (when "House Detectives" ensured that you were actually married to the girl in your hotel room and laws considered heterosexual oral sex illegal "sodomy') a political party could get away with such conduct because the majority of American voters were the sexual Puritans that the Baby Boomer Generation rebelled against.

Today, in 2013, outside of the Bible Belt, most Americans are as tolerant of the Bible Belt Protestants screaming about "Sin" as Bible Belt Protestants are tolerant of Mormon missionaries ringing their door bell and shoving the Book of Mormon in their face.

As I said, this ain't Granpa's America anymore. This ain't even Garndpa's Bible Belt any more. Attitudes have changed and the majority of American's are turned off by a party that wants to cram 1950's Bible Belt standards down other people's throats ........ Except for Sarah Palin's grandkids because, .... "Hey! ...... That's different because the pre-marital sex and sex out of wedlock that was highly condemned in the Bible Belt in 1953 is now O.K. because .... Well, ..... Times have changed. ......... Do you really think that you can find a 21 year old virgin at the University of Alabama? ......... Except for Adam and Steve! They are SINNERS!"

If Adam and Steve are fiscal conservatives, pro-small business and want ObamaCare repealed, why should Republican Florida Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen care if hey want to get "married" and why should the GOP piss off South Florida voters to please the religious Right in Alabama?

reply

#32 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:45 pm

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #30
Quote: Justme wrote in post #24

Plus, the left glom onto this and it works against the TP.

I'm not even sure SP holds a low opinion of us (people of faith) as much as it doesn't belong in the political arena.

[quote]

I'll give you a big "AMEN!" on that one. What you and others choose to believe and how you choose to live your own lives is your own business as long as you aren't committing crimes.

I can't really argue with that.

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #30
I do object when you want to use the force of government to force the rest of us to live by your beliefs,though.

Like the "belief" in globull warming causing our electricity rates to "necessarily skyrocket"? Putting coal companies out of business?

Like the "belief" that health care is a "right" causing the train wreck known as Zero care - and, coming soon to a country near you - single payer (i.e. Socialized medicine)

SP - I know you're not a person of faith. I am, but I am also a believer in the fact that we're a secular country. I would oppose laws that would turn us into some kind of theocracy as much as anyone.

But -given the examples I listed above - can you not see that the "clear and present danger" is here - and it's coming from THE LEFT, not the RIGHT (religious or otherwise)

I just wish you would consider saving your vitriol for the REAL enemies who are screwing up our country NOW - not potential enemies (from your viewpoint) who are really pretty impotent at this point in time.

You're a brave man. Go and break through the lines. And remember, while you're out there risking your life and limb through shot and shell, we'll be in be in here thinking what a sucker you are.
~Rufus T. Firefly

reply

#33 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:49 pm (Last edited: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:50 pm)

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #25

So yes - I'll repeat. This issue (and contraception) is a red herring because no legislation - currently or in the future - is in the works to change it.

Since this is related,I wish to post something I have posted before in stand-alone threads. Not only will abortion every be overturned in this country,within 20 years it will be MANDATORY for any family that already has two children,and any woman on public aid.

As I have tried to point out before,there were very valid reasons for large families prior to the 1960's. Farming,for example, was very labor intensive,and this is why so many farm families used to have 10-12 children. Given the living conditions at the time it was practically guaranteed that some would die off long before they became adults,and large familes insured there would be someone left around to do the work to provide for gramps and granny once they got too old to work.

Same thing with commercial fishing families,and other occcupations. Even blacksmits wanted to expand their reach,and what better way to do it than send the "extra" children off down the road to the closest villages to start up a smithing operations there?

The coming of the Industrial Age late in the 19th century resulted in mechanized farm equipment that allowed farmers to farm more and bigger fields in the same amount of time,so they bought up more land to farm.

Plus,the Industrial Age provided plenty of manufacturing jobs for the farmers who were displaced for one reason or another. A win/win situation for everybody.

Now,for all intents and purposes,the Industrial Age is OVER. Those highly paid manufacturing and union jobs are long gone to Asia,and they ain't coming back. Ever. In fact,within 20 years or so they won't even exist in China.

As I have said before,the Industrial Age is over due to the advancements in electronics and technology. Most obvious is the 3-D Printer.

Just last week there was a perfect example of just how far this has already advanced when there was a news story on tv about a boy maybe 8 years old that had been born without a hand on one arm. He had just a stub of a hand,but no fingers. His father did a lot of research on this subject and came up with a software program designed by one guy in Sweden (I think. Could have been Norway) and another guy in South Africa. He contacted them and told them he wanted to make a hand for his son,and they gave him the software for free.

He bought a 3-D printer big enough for his needs for $2,000,and for what he guessed to be $8-10 in materials,printed out a working hand for his son made out of blue and green plastic. For the first time in his life his son can now pick up things with that hand and do almost everything else a typical boy his age can do. All this for roughly $2010,000,and he did it at home.

Think about the meaning of this for a minute. Need a new coffee pot or tv? No problem,buy and download a software package from the internet,and just print it out right there at home.

Now....,think about the result this is going to have on jobs for blue-collar workers and apprentices or helpers. The obvious answer is "Other than people like delivery drivers to deliver the plastic,there won't be any/"

NOW....,what happens when there are healthy young men sitting around all day with no work to do,and no prospects of any work to do in the future. What do they do? Hold prayer meetings? Play Yatzhee? Go to Yoga classes?

Nope,they dream up mischief to keep themselves busy and to amuse themselves.

NOW,what happens when there are 50 or more MILLION of these young men and young women sitting around at government feed centers with nothing to do all day but wait for the Soylent Green spigots to be turned on so they can eat.

NOW you truly know why every government in the world is desperately trying to hire more police and disarm their populations.

Once again there are going to be 3 groups of citizens. The Uber wealthy on the top who can have all the children they want because they are in power and they can afford to feed and educate them,the lucky working class who lucked out and got jobs with public utilites,as truck drivers,repair men,etc,etc,etc. ALL these jobs will be controlled by the ruling class,and if you are a trouble maker you won't get one. The fortunate few who DO get these jobs will maybe be allowed to have 2 children. If the woman gets pregnant again,she will be forced to abort. Period. She may even face mandatory sterilization after giving birth to the second child.

Then you have the unfortunate many,who for one reason or another couldn't get a job,and all they do is sit around in public housing waiting for somebody to feed and water them. You can bet your ass that mandatory sterilization is going to be a part of the agreement they make to insure they keep getting fed and watered.

There just ain't no way the world can afford to let the general populations to continue to breed without restrictions because there just isn't going to be a big demand in the future for laborers.

And it doesn't matter a bit if you and I like this idea of not because it WILL happen. It will happen because it HAS to happen to avoid mass famines and daily riots with out of control crime.

And this ain't even addressing the longer lifespan that people living today will enjoy thanks to genetic engineering and nano-technology.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it�s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

reply

#34 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:01 pm

Quote: Polybius wrote in post #31
Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #27

Allow me to repeat what I wrote WITH EMPHASIS: Homosexuals to whom homosexual marriage is the number one issue, ..... ...... and others are probably never going to vote for a republican -

I'm sorry you missed that part.

I did NOT miss that part.

Why would you think that being a fiscal conservative or being a foreign policy conservative or being a Republican or being Cuban-American means that Florida Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen is duty-bound to oppose whether or not the State of Florida wants to allow Adam to get half of Steve's stuff plus alimony if they split up?

To a Cuban Catholic, whether or not Adam and Steve would be truly "married" is up to the Catholic Church to decide (The answer is, "No, Adam and Steve are not really marrtied in the eyes of the Catholic Church") so why drag the Bible and religion into a tax rights and inheritance rights issue between Andam and Steve and the State of Florida like those Bible Belt Protestants do?

We're waaaaaaaay off the topic here - I think I've made my points pretty clear. They are, after all, my opinions. Feel free to agree or disagree.

And remember - opinions are like a-holes - everybody has one.

reply

#35 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:57 pm

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #25

Yes - libertarians are overwhelmingly intelligent, and they see the abortion issue (when brought up by the dems to sway LIVs) for the red-herring that it is.

Make no mistake - I hate abortion, and personally I'd like to see us go back to pre-1973 (where it was a state's issue). But I realize that probably isn't going to happen - there's just too much money, power and influence on the other side. And whenever something like the current Texas law makes it through a legislature, the Left will spare no expense and never take "no" for an answer until they get their way. On this particular law, they will keep going until they get their way and the law is overturned.

So yes - I'll repeat. This issue (and contraception) is a red herring because no legislation - currently or in the future - is in the works to change it.

Like in Texas?

Zitat

Therein lies the problem: Good candidates like Cuccinelli are trashed relentlessly - and the trashing not only influences the LIVs (not surprising) but apparently influences those on our side, as well (surprising).

Forgive me, but I'm still not clear on what your point in this whole discussion that we've been having is.

This is my point. Why does it surprise you our side is influenced by the trashing? Why does it mystify you that anyone on our side would find his stance a bit of unwelcome demagoguery?, making him look to some as a kook ?

He's a politician , it's a tap dance and over the top rhetoric doesnt work when you're at the wrong end of the cannon. Even if you don't think it's over the top it's best to recognize others will.

Zitat

In the past, we've had people of faith hold high office and it hasn't been a problem. I understand (and thoroughly support) the fact that we're a secular nation, not a theocracy. But previously that hasn't prevented people of faith (or not faith) from running for office.

Why is it a problem now? I guess it is . . . because the democrats say it is.

You continue in trying to put me on the defensive. If, as you claim, you're unclear what I mean it might help if you to stop reacting to things I never said

reply

#36 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:58 pm

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #28

Yeah right. Hows that working out. This stalwart of GOP anti tax principles voted to raise taxes last year. She is also a radical gay right advocate. She sits on the LGBT Equality Caucus and she pushed for Ask and Tell in the military which actually makes being gay an issue where there shouldn't be any sexual issues at all.

BTW, why did they Gerrymander her seat away from South Beach if it is so safe and she is loved there? Oh yeah. It wasn't.

The reality is that Democrats want to spend more than they can possibly tax and Republicans want to tax less than what they actually spend.

RESULT: A $17 Trillion debt that is destroying our present economy and will destroy our children's future.

Whether the Left-fringe and the Right-fringe want to admit it, to get out of the $17 Trillion hole, U.S. Government income will have to rise and U.S. Government spending will have to decrease. The continued borrowing of 43 Cents out of every Dollar that the U.S. Government spends is simply not sustainable and Political Puritanism by both sides is the problem, not the solution. In raising taxes, it is imperative that the 47% end up paying SOMETHING so that they have some "skin in the game". Otherwise, the Left will always rob Peter to pay Paul and get untaxed Paul's vote.

Gerrymandering is a complex issue and when one geographic distric moves in one direction, other districs must move in another direction. The fact remains, however, that she, a Republican, won re-election in South Beach TWELVE times.

So a South Florida Republican is not as Politically Puritanically Pure as a rural Deep South Congressman. So what? That is the American reality. In most American Congressional districts, a rural Deep South Congressman would would be defeated.

NEVER has the Deep South Political Purity been able to impose its will, BY ITSELF, upon the rest of America. In 1968, in Miami, as a kid who took the bus up Lejeune Road to Miami International Airport to see Richard Nixon land for the Republican convention, I shook the hands of both Richard Nixon and Strom Thurmond within 5 minutes of each other. In 1948, when Strom Thurmond tried to cram Deep South Political Puritanism down America's throat with the Dixiecrats, the Deep South crashed and burned. In 1968, in coalition with the old Party of Lincoln, Strom Thurmond ended up on the winning side. It is an irony of History that the Deep South that joined Northern Republicans in 1968 is now lecturing Northern Republicans about who is a "RINO" and who is a "real" Republican.

In regards to "radical gay right advocate", what dog do you have in that fight?

If the State of Florida wants to give Adam and Steve certain tax rights and inheritance rights, what business is that of yours if you do not even live in Florida? What business is it of the GOP?

Why are you so emotionallly invested in the sex life of perfect strangers?

In 1953, a good answer would have been, "Because they are SINNERS and SIN cannot be tolerated in America!"

However, in 1953, getting a B.J. from your own wife was legally considered "sodomy" in the South. Times have changed and the majority of Americans no longer tolerate the Government or Bible-Thumping Protestant strangers in the bedroom unless a hooker or a child is involved.

Would you like to share how many times, within the past 2 months, you have engaged in conduct that would have constituted illegal "sodomy" back in 1953? Why should it be any of my business or anybody else's business? It's not.

The U.S. cultural tipping point has been reached where, to the majority of American voters, obsessing about other people's sex live is just plain creepy (unless, of course, it is within the context of the voyeurism of Reality TV and People Magazine). The bottom line is that that is now a guranteed way to lose general elections.

reply

#37 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:07 pm

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #32
Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #30
Quote: Justme wrote in post #24

Plus, the left glom onto this and it works against the TP.

I'm not even sure SP holds a low opinion of us (people of faith) as much as it doesn't belong in the political arena.

[quote]

I'll give you a big "AMEN!" on that one. What you and others choose to believe and how you choose to live your own lives is your own business as long as you aren't committing crimes.

I can't really argue with that.

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #30
I do object when you want to use the force of government to force the rest of us to live by your beliefs,though.

Like the "belief" in globull warming causing our electricity rates to "necessarily skyrocket"? Putting coal companies out of business?

Like the "belief" that health care is a "right" causing the train wreck known as Zero care - and, coming soon to a country near you - single payer (i.e. Socialized medicine)

SP - I know you're not a person of faith. I am, but I am also a believer in the fact that we're a secular country. I would oppose laws that would turn us into some kind of theocracy as much as anyone.

But -given the examples I listed above - can you not see that the "clear and present danger" is here - and it's coming from THE LEFT, not the RIGHT (religious or otherwise)

I just wish you would consider saving your vitriol for the REAL enemies who are screwing up our country NOW - not potential enemies (from your viewpoint) who are really pretty impotent at this point in time.

What the HELL are you babbling about? Since when have *I* ever claimed the enviro-Nazi's were a religious group or indicated that I follow those beliefs?

And,the various Christian and Jewish faiths of the Old and New Testaments are LEFT-WING when it comes to politics. They are all about tribalism and sharing.Maybe not with those or other tribes or viewpoints,but certainly with each other. In theory,anyway.

Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it�s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012)

reply

#38 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:18 pm

Quote: Justme wrote in post #35

You continue in trying to put me on the defensive. If, as you claim, you're unclear what I mean it might help if you to stop reacting to things I never said

First, I'm trying to put words in your mouth.

Now, I'm trying to put you on the defensive.

I'm a bad, bad person.

Let me try this another way. You're critical of Cuccinelli because he spoke at a pro-life rally, right? And (now please correct me if I'm wrong, because I wouldn't want to put words in your mouth) you would be critical about other candidates doing things that *****the independent voter***** might find troublesome.

What kinds of things might those be? Please - I won't even suggest any. I'll let you supply examples, if you wish.

You have the floor.

reply

#39 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:26 pm (Last edited: Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:31 pm)

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #37
Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #32
Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #30
Quote: Justme wrote in post #24

Plus, the left glom onto this and it works against the TP.

I'm not even sure SP holds a low opinion of us (people of faith) as much as it doesn't belong in the political arena.

[quote]

I'll give you a big "AMEN!" on that one. What you and others choose to believe and how you choose to live your own lives is your own business as long as you aren't committing crimes.

I can't really argue with that.

Quote: sneakypete wrote in post #30
I do object when you want to use the force of government to force the rest of us to live by your beliefs,though.

Like the "belief" in globull warming causing our electricity rates to "necessarily skyrocket"? Putting coal companies out of business?

Like the "belief" that health care is a "right" causing the train wreck known as Zero care - and, coming soon to a country near you - single payer (i.e. Socialized medicine)

SP - I know you're not a person of faith. I am, but I am also a believer in the fact that we're a secular country. I would oppose laws that would turn us into some kind of theocracy as much as anyone.

But -given the examples I listed above - can you not see that the "clear and present danger" is here - and it's coming from THE LEFT, not the RIGHT (religious or otherwise)

I just wish you would consider saving your vitriol for the REAL enemies who are screwing up our country NOW - not potential enemies (from your viewpoint) who are really pretty impotent at this point in time.

What the HELL are you babbling about? Since when have *I* ever claimed the enviro-Nazi's were a religious group or indicated that I follow those beliefs?

And,the various Christian and Jewish faiths of the Old and New Testaments are LEFT-WING when it comes to politics. They are all about tribalism and sharing.Maybe not with those or other tribes or viewpoints,but certainly with each other. In theory,anyway.

Oh for Pete's sake ..... where the HELL is your reading comprehension?

YOU said AND I QUOTE "I DO OBJECT WHEN YOU WANT TO USE THE FORCE OF GOVERNMENT TO FORCE THE REST OF US TO LIVE BY YOUR BELIEFS."

I cited examples of leftist imposing what I see as their "religion" on the rest of us. SO:

The "you" in that statement is not YOU (sneakypete) but you (people like Obama and other Leftists) who have "questionable" beliefs and "faith in unseen things" FORCING THE REST OF US (WE, US) TO LIVE BY YOUR (THEIR) BELIEFS.

FOR GOD'S SAKE, YOU PEOPLE ARE DENSE TODAY

reply

#40 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:33 pm (Last edited: Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:33 pm)

To all:

I'm going to take a break from this site for at least a while. I apparently cannot communicate effectively anymore, and the frustration is killing me

reply

#41 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:38 pm

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #4
We are a secular country, so anyone who mentions God or ****HORROR OF HORRORS***** says that God might not agree with abortion, is a real wacko and should never - NEVER - run for political office.

Got it!

A secular nation? We have a non-denominational federal government. Bur Since its inception America has been a Christian Nation.

Zitat
If we pass beyond these matters to a view of American life, as expressed by its laws, its business, its customs, and its society, we find every where a clear recognition of the same truth. Among other matters, note the following: the form of oath universally prevailing, concluding with an appeal to the Almighty; the custom of opening sessions of all deliberative bodies and most conventions with prayer; the prefatory words of all wills, "In the name of God, amen;" the laws respecting the observance of the Sabbath, with the general cessation of all secular business, and the closing of courts, legislatures, and other similar public assemblies on that day; the churches and church organizations which abound in every city, town, and hamlet; the multitude of charitable organizations existing every where under Christian auspices; the gigantic missionary associations, with general support, and aiming to establish Christian missions in every quarter of the globe. These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation

Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States - 143 U.S. 457 (1892)

Learn True American History from actual documents in the Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel06-2.html

It pains me to see Americans repeating the lie that has only cropped up recently in American history.

The roar you hear in the distance will be the sound of banks crashing, followed by the silence of business-as-usual grinding to a halt. After that, the crackle of gunfire.

reply

#42 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:38 pm

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #40
To all:

I'm going to take a break from this site for at least a while. I apparently cannot communicate effectively anymore, and the frustration is killing me

I hear you Rufus--hurry back man you are one of the sane ones

Proud to be part of the 'Fringe'

reply

#43 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Mon Nov 04, 2013 8:47 pm

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #38

Let me try this another way. You're critical of Cuccinelli because he spoke at a pro-life rally, right?

Sigh, wrong

Zitat

And (now please correct me if I'm wrong, because I wouldn't want to put words in your mouth) you would be critical about other candidates doing things that *****the independent voter***** might find troublesome.

If they seem counterproductive yes. Wouldn't you?

Zitat

What kinds of things might those be? Please - I won't even suggest any. I'll let you supply examples, if you wish.

You have the floor.

There's really nothing more to say. I've been as clear as I know how to be. It may very well be I lack the skills to get my views across

reply

#44 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:53 am

So Rufus high tailed it to an even purer conservative forum, in which even thinking the tea party might be wrong is a bannable offense?

This too will prove to be too impure for the absolute purist brigade and that will splinter itself.

I said it once and I'll say it again, we truly are the stupid party.

Adam Baldwin ‏@AdamBaldwin 3h
"If you don't like your cancer, you will get to keep your cancer." - #Obamacare

reply

#45 | RE: Levin: RINOS, Rove, push for McAulliff Win datum

Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:58 am

Quote: Weird Tolkienish Figure wrote in post #44
So Rufus high tailed it to an even purer conservative forum, in which even thinking the tea party might be wrong is a bannable offense?

This too will prove to be too impure for the absolute purist brigade and that will splinter itself.

I said it once and I'll say it again, we truly are the stupid party.

I don't think that's the case or even a fair accusation

We clearly were not understooding eachother, thats all. I take him at his word, everyone needs a breather now and then

reply

RUSH: Tea Party Wants To Beat Dems. GOP Don�t Look Like They Do. � � Sidney Powell responds after Trump campaign says she is not part of legal team:

Page 3 of 4 � Page 1 2 3 4 Page �

Related topics

Replies

Last post

If Humpty wore glasses, Karl Rove he would be
Created in forum General Political News by Eglman 5 Tue Sep 24, 2013 1:21 pm
Cedric • Views: 199
GOP Special Interest Groups Push House GOP to Cave on Immigration Bill
Created in forum General Political News by Eglman 4 Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:31 pm
Eglman • Views: 200
Crossroads launches $100K push for immigration reform (Rove and the Rino's)
Created in forum General Political News by Eglman 0 Mon Jun 10, 2013 3:53 pm
Eglman • Views: 222
Mark Levin: "RINO" Issa Didn't Investigate IRS Before Because He "Despises The Tea Party"
Created in forum General Political News by Eglman 33 Sun May 26, 2013 5:39 pm
Justme • Views: 891
War! Trump, Levin Pummel Rove As Conservative Battle Escalates
Created in forum General Political News by Frank Cannon 3 Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:58 am
Brevity • Views: 260
Rove Email Leaks: Ideological War Opens in GOP (Karl Rove is a LIAR and a LOSER)
Created in forum General Political News by Frank Cannon 0 Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:37 pm
Frank Cannon • Views: 152

Levin to Rove: �Bring it on, Karl baby. Bring it on, doughboy. Bring on your little whiteboard� (re. Steve King)
Created in forum General Political News by Justme

Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:46 am
von

Olivia • Views: 153

EXTENDED AUDIO: Mark Levin exposes Karl Rove, Steven J. Law and why they are bad for GOP
Created in forum General Political News by Eglman 5 Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:59 am
Frank Cannon • Views: 234
Rove Declares War on Tea Party
Created in forum What's Wrong With Politics by Frank Cannon 63 Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:42 pm
Cedric • Views: 1564