(David Gregory unavailable for comment)

It sounds like this man, who shot one of three pit bulls that were attacking a defenseless young boy, saved this boy’s life. But because he fired his handgun on a Washington DC city street which violates their city gun laws, he could face up to a year in prison:

BUSINESS INSIDER – A Washington D.C. man who fatally shot a trio of pit bulls as they attacked a young boy could face charges for violating the District’s gun laws.

An unnamed 11-year-old boy was riding his new bike in Washington D.C. on Sunday when he collided with a pack of unleashed and unattended pit bulls that began attacking him, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

An unidentified neighbor saw the mauling and used his handgun to shoot one of the dogs. A D.C. police officer who heard the gun shots fatally shot the other two dogs.

Since the neighbor technically fired his gun on a D.C. street, and not on his personal property, he could face up to a year in prison and a $1,000 fine, DCist reported Wednesday.

MORE…

If they charge this man with a crime, this will once again prove how stupid these gun laws are in that they don’t stop crime but they do punish innocent Americans.

http://www.therightscoop.com/absurd-man-...+Right+Scoop%29

Unbelieveable!!

The man needs to go to court and ask for a jury trial. That will end the bs.

The child is seen as acceptable collateral damage. Just like all of the children killed on the streets of Chicago. Children the president neglected to mention in his inauguration speech on Monday. He did mention the children of Newtown, though.

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #4

---

The child is seen as acceptable collateral damage. Just like all of the children killed on the streets of Chicago. Children the president neglected to mention in his inauguration speech on Monday. He did mention the children of Newtown, though.

---

Quote: musiclady wrote in post #5

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #4

---

The child is seen as acceptable collateral damage. Just like all of the children killed on the streets of Chicago. Children the president neglected to mention in his inauguration speech on Monday. He did mention the children of Newtown, though.

---

Isn't it remarkable that the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton didn't notice that the Chicago kids are black and the Newtown kids are white.

The political agenda of disarming America obviously trumps everything else....

---

It may be a fine point, but the Progressive agenda of disarming America is obviously trumping the 'social justice' of not having young blacks slaughtered to Jackson and Sharpton.

While 'social justice' may be on their lips, it's clearly not a matter of great concern for them when it comes to the violence in Chicago being completely ignored.

Obviously Obama's Marxism is what's allowing them to ignore the worsening condition of the African-American community. It's not their priority. Marxism is.

And anyone who dares mention Obama's failure to improve the conditions 'his people' are in, is told to shut up.

Quote: musiclady wrote in post #7

---

It may be a fine point, but the Progressive agenda of disarming America is obviously trumping the 'social justice' of not having young blacks slaughtered to Jackson and Sharpton.

While 'social justice' may be on their lips, it's clearly not a matter of great concern for them when it comes to the violence in Chicago being completely ignored.

Obviously Obama's Marxism is what's allowing them to ignore the worsening condition of the African-American community. It's not their priority. Marxism is.

And anyone who dares mention Obama's failure to improve the conditions 'his people' are in, is told to shut up.

---