http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...l-told-him.html

Zitat

---

A wealthy Democratic donor is fanning the flames of speculation that Hillary Clinton is indeed running for president.

Sacramento developer Angelo Tsakopoulos says Bill Clinton has confirmed the presumed plan that the former Secretary of State will make a bid for the White House again.

The millionaire told the Greek Reporter that Clinton's husband revealed his wife's political ambition, as the power couple gear up for a 2016 race.

'Hillary will be our next President and she will be a great one,' Mr Tsakopoulos told the Greek Reporter at a private gala event in California over the weekend.

'I talk to her husband, and he confirmed it. She will run,' he added. Reps from the Clinton camp have publicly addressed his statements.

Mr Tsakopoulos is the founder of AKT Development. The Greek native is a longtime Democratic donor who played a key role in fundraising for Team Clinton in her first presidential run.

His daughter, Eleni Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis, was appointed the United States Ambassador to Hungary by President Obama.

She was sworn in by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on January 7, 2010, with her father holding the Bible for the ceremony.

She is expected to serve as an adviser for Clinton's reported bid for the presidency.

---

I don't believe any of this. First off, she will be 69 in '16. Running for President isn't an old mans game anymore. Secondly she has so many health problems now that she has to wear clown classes to see plus some sort of drinking issue. These dopes also act like there isn't going to be a full field of minorities running. Deval Patrick, Corey Booker. Let's not forget Biden thinks he is the heir apparent being VP.

Slick may want to get his semen back into the Oval Office, but it ain't going to happen.

Quote: Heisenberg wrote in post #2

---

Then she shall be the next president of the US.

Because the GOP is done, done,done.

---

Quote: ThirstyMan wrote in post #3

---

We lost in '12 with Mitt Romney at the helm. Say all you want negative about him, he was clearly the best of the GOP candidates
and he was far better qualified to be president than Obama.

---

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #4

---

Quote: ThirstyMan wrote in post #3

---

We lost in '12 with Mitt Romney at the helm. Say all you want negative about him, he was clearly the best of the GOP candidates
and he was far better qualified to be president than Obama.

---

Nah. Romney was a total disaster who had deep pockets. He was a failed NE RINO Gov who couldn't even hope to get reelected a second term in MA so he moved on to Pres to wash away the demons of his father. We also found out that the guy billing himself as the organization businessman had constructed one of the worst election teams I can remember. Atrocious get out the vote and mismanaged at every opportunity to get ahead of Zero. If you don't believe me, try and find the "after action report" conference call from Romney's team the Friday after the election. It was Keystone Cops time with a heavy dose of denial on all levels. Santorum, who had zero name recognition and 3$ to his name, gave him a run for his money Mitt was so lousy. Mitt just had all the money in the world to keep him alive when others would have folded.

---

[quote=Heisenberg|p16341
Both.

It's a perfect storm to bring an end to the experiment.

I have no, zero,nada,hope that America can or even should be salvaged.

[/quote]
Do not give up hope.

Out there is the candidate who will say what needs to be said, has the charisma to keep saying it in the face of the bought and paid for media, and will appeal to the angry man voter, be they Dem or Repub.

Paul has possibilities, but I think his old man has tainted those.

What it takes is a POTUS as poor as Oblunder to bring out that kind of conservative who will not care about the media and go after the policies that have destroyed America.

We had to have a Carter before we could have a Reagan.

To set that up, we need a resounding group of Tea Party types to win in '14 on a grassroots level revolution.
THAT in itself will be the shot that sinks the squishies in the GOP that think they run things, like Rove, et al.

Quote: Brevity wrote in post #7

---

[quote=Heisenberg|p16341
Both.

It's a perfect storm to bring an end to the experiment.

I have no, zero,nada,hope that America can or even should be salvaged.

---

Quote: ThirstyMan wrote in post #8

---

Quote: Brevity wrote in post #7

---

[quote=Heisenberg|p16341
Both.

It's a perfect storm to bring an end to the experiment.

I have no, zero,nada,hope that America can or even should be salvaged.

---

Do not give up hope.
....
We had to have a Carter before we could have a Reagan.

---

1980 was over 3 decades of cultural and societal rot ago, throw in the same amount of corruption and entrenched tyranny, and you've got, well, where we are today.

Quote: ThirstyMan wrote in post #5

---

Betting on Santorum as a national candidate? Seems to me you don't have a finger on the pulse.
Are the American people interested in a moral light type candidate like a Romney or Santorum?
or have they left this kind of leader behind and are now voting with their self interested hand out mentality?

I don't like my answer to that question. I see it as the latter.

---

Quote: Justme wrote in post #11

---

Complacency mixed with stupidity is why we will rebound. The majority vote that gave us obama will sit out next time. The LIV who said Romney was no better and sat out this time will vote next time to prove to themselves they really do matter.

---

Let her run.

If the American people desire a third term of Obama, then they will get what they deserve.

My guess is they won't, but I could be wrong.

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #12

---

Quote: ThirstyMan wrote in post #5

---

Betting on Santorum as a national candidate? Seems to me you don't have a finger on the pulse.
Are the American people interested in a moral light type candidate like a Romney or Santorum?
or have they left this kind of leader behind and are now voting with their self interested hand out mentality?

I don't like my answer to that question. I see it as the latter.

---

If you saw the stump speeches Santorum was giving in the states he was winning or competitive in, against the odds, they were all about freedom and the Constitution.

---