The American Thinker
by Stella Morabito
April 6, 2013

Forces pushing for genderless marriage are a wellspring of fallacies and unanswered questions about the consequences. Let's explore some of them.

1. What's love got to do with it?

Nothing. Romanticizing this debate by claiming that any two people in love should have a civil right to civil marriage is a foolish distraction. Neither judges nor legislators have any business discussing "affection" as a factor in defining civil marriage. Clergy who bless marriages have a legitimate and separate role in discerning the internal dynamics of couples. But not the state.

(excerpted)
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/t...l#ixzz2PixelzA1

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #1

---

Forces pushing for genderless marriage are a wellspring of fallacies and unanswered questions about the consequences. Let's explore some of them.

---