April 19, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

Now that we know who the bombers are and one of them is dead, and that they are Chechen Muslims, the media has gone into “Palestinian” mode insisting that we need to talk about the conflict in Chechnya.

We can talk about Chechnya, but the issue there and everywhere else is Islamic nationalism or Islamism. The bombers could have been from Chechnya or Mali or Bosnia or Iraq or Egypt or Afghanistan or any Muslim country where Islamists are active. And that’s most Muslim countries, especially after the Arab Spring.

There is a conflict in Chechnya and Iraq and Pakistan and Afghanistan and Thailand and Nigeria and the Philippines and India and Israel and France and a hundred other countries.

Where there is a sizable Muslim majority or even sizable minority, there is conflict.

Any talk about pressuring Russia into “resolving” or “appeasing” Chechen Islamists (at least the ones not allied with Russia) is a silly waste of time.

Russia isn’t Israel. It’s not going to be intimidated into making deals with terrorists. And talking about the demands of Chechen Islamists is a waste of time. Their demands are the same as the demands of all Islamists.

Islamism is Transnational. You cannot solve it locally. The situation in Israel has proven that. Giving in to territorial demands always fails because a transnational movement wants more than a few miles here and there. They want a regional and then a global Caliphate.

America had nothing to do with the conflict in Chechnya. That didn’t stop Dzhokar Tsarneav and Tamerlan Tsarneav from carrying out the mass murder of Americans.

To understand Dzhokar Tsarneav and Tamerlan Tsarneav is to understand that Islam is transnational.

“World view” is listed as “Islam” and his “Personal priority” is “career and money”.

He has posted links to videos of fighters in the Syrian civil war and to Islamic web pages with titles like “Salamworld, my religion is Islam” and “There is no God but Allah, let that ring out in our hearts”.

It’s Allah Akbar all over again.

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield...amic-terrorism/

Telling it like it is. These nuts will not rest until everyone is dead or there is a global caliphate. Period.

The media uses political correctness against rational thinking.

They accuse Americans of being unable to distinguish between race, nationality and faith. They reframe the argument to attack the audience.

Quote: Eglman wrote in post #1

---

April 19, 2013 By Daniel Greenfield

Now that we know who the bombers are and one of them is dead, and that they are Chechen Muslims, the media has gone into “Palestinian” mode insisting that we need to talk about the conflict in Chechnya.

We can talk about Chechnya, but the issue there and everywhere else is Islamic nationalism or Islamism. The bombers could have been from Chechnya or Mali or Bosnia or Iraq or Egypt or Afghanistan or any Muslim country where Islamists are active. And that’s most Muslim countries, especially after the Arab Spring.

There is a conflict in Chechnya and Iraq and Pakistan and Afghanistan and Thailand and Nigeria and the Philippines and India and Israel and France and a hundred other countries.

Where there is a sizable Muslim majority or even sizable minority, there is conflict.

Any talk about pressuring Russia into “resolving” or “appeasing” Chechen Islamists (at least the ones not allied with Russia) is a silly waste of time.

Russia isn’t Israel. It’s not going to be intimidated into making deals with terrorists. And talking about the demands of Chechen Islamists is a waste of time. Their demands are the same as the demands of all Islamists.

Islamism is Transnational. You cannot solve it locally. The situation in Israel has proven that. Giving in to territorial demands always fails because a transnational movement wants more than a few miles here and there. They want a regional and then a global Caliphate.

America had nothing to do with the conflict in Chechnya. That didn’t stop Dzhokar Tsarneav and Tamerlan Tsarneav from carrying out the mass murder of Americans.

To understand Dzhokar Tsarneav and Tamerlan Tsarneav is to understand that Islam is transnational.

“World view” is listed as “Islam” and his “Personal priority” is “career and money”.

He has posted links to videos of fighters in the Syrian civil war and to Islamic web pages with titles like “Salamworld, my religion is Islam” and “There is no God but Allah, let that ring out in our hearts”.

It’s Allah Akbar all over again.

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield...amic-terrorism/

---

Zitat

---

Where there is a sizable Muslim majority or even sizable minority, there is conflict.

---

Dead on. The worst thing that happened in really addressing this issue is when Bush called Islam the religion of peace. It isn't and all that line did was give radical groups like CAIR ammo to attack and denigrate anyone who says otherwise. As we can see in Boston, it isn't working out too well.

wow ced only MSNBC and dems would make that connection

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #7

---

Quote: Frank Cannon wrote in post #5

---

The worst thing that happened in really addressing this issue is when Bush called Islam the religion of peace. As we can see in Boston, it isn't working out too well.

---

You're blaming the Boston Marathon bombing on Bush?

---

The entire thing gets muddled because of conflicts and nations that we should have no involvement in. Bosnians, Afghanis and Iraqis will continue on whether or not I give a damn about their conflict within their borders, their tribes or their faith.

No what I read was that Bush was simply saying something to appease Islam (stupidly I will grant you that) but to read into it Bush+Boston=compliance is connecting code words like the left likes to say

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #11

---

The entire thing gets muddled because of conflicts and nations that we should have no involvement in. Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq will continue on whether or not I give a damn about their conflict within their borders, their tribes or their faith.

---