Wow, really?

Via National Journal:

Whether bloggers count as journalists has mostly been a matter of esoterics for reporter types. But as Congress weighs a media shield law in response to the Associated Press/Justice Department subpoena scandal, the question is gaining an urgency that lawmakers are finding hard to ignore as they turn to writing the bill.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., took on the issue—and stumbled.

“Who is a journalist is a question we need to ask ourselves,” he said. “Is any blogger out there saying anything—do they deserve First Amendment protection? These are the issues of our times.”

The verbal slipup aside (of course bloggers are covered under the Bill of Rights!), Graham’s riffing on constitutional law exposes one of the age-old tensions between journalism as a product and journalism as an activity. What Graham really meant to ask was whether bloggers deserve the specific protections of the First Amendment that are granted to the press. But as the line between blogger and journalist has blurred, a far more relevant challenge is figuring out whether those protections apply to the behavior of finding and passing on (sometimes secret) information, or if they apply only to people with little plastic ID badges to prove their affiliation.

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/06/05/graha...ent-protection/

This shows what a mental defective this confirmed bachelor is. He has no idea what he is talking about on any issue and he really doesn't understand the Constitution.

The 1st Amendment was written strictly for journalist?

I learn something new every day!

Aw, ya should cut Lady Lindsey some slack.

After all, it's difficult if not impossible for a ventriloquist dummy to speak coherently when his puppet master isn't around.

Where was McClown, anyway?

I think this guy knows whereof he speaks regarding Lindsey's motivations: http://hillbuzz.org/how-barack-obama-and...-rainbows-39568