House Republicans will vote this week to delay the part of ObamaCare requiring Americans to buy health insurance by next year, arguing that President Obama recently delaying the part of the law requiring employers to offer health insurance is a corporate favor that slights struggling, average Americans.

In announcing the vote last week, House Speaker John Boehner said the Republican-controlled chamber also will vote to delay the so-called employer mandate because such decisions require congressional authority, then rattled off a list of reasons why delaying only the employer mandate is unfair.

“If you’re a software company making billions in profits, you’re exempt from ObamaCare next year,” he said Friday. “But if you’re a 28-year-old struggling to pay-off your student loans, you’re not. … Is it fair for the president to give American businesses an exemption from his health law’s mandates without giving the same break to the rest of America? Hell no.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/...andate-unfair/?

Obama's decisions are made by decree and he rules without oversight. Over three more years of this and we'll all be broke and working as serfs.

Zitat

---

“If you’re a software company making billions in profits, you’re exempt from ObamaCare next year,” he said Friday. “But if you’re a 28-year-old struggling to pay-off your student loans, you’re not. … Is it fair for the president to give American businesses an exemption from his health law’s mandates without giving the same break to the rest of America? Hell no.”

---

Class warfare, anyone? I thought "conservatives" were supposed to be opposed to that sort of thing.

Here's a novel idea, Johnny. The tyrant-in-chief trashes the Constitution on a daily basis. (Yes, the Constitution. Remember? You know, that g*******d piece of paper that a bunch of old racist white men wrote that we're supposed to live under)

How about opposing him on THAT basis?

Check the date: February 25, 2010

Like his buddy Zero, most of what Boehner says has an expiration date.

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #5

---

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #4

---

Check the date: February 25, 2010

---

Yeah, Rufie, I noticed that, too, and the first thing I thought of when I read your inane comment was:

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #7

---

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #6

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #5

---

Quote: Rufus T Firefly wrote in post #4

---

Check the date: February 25, 2010

---

Yeah, Rufie, I noticed that, too, and the first thing I thought of when I read your inane comment was:

---

How is Rufus' statement "inane" by pointing out the date of the bit that you posted?

---

Please read the exchange between Rufie and me again.

You'll notice that the inanity to which I referred was contained in Rufie's first (snide) comment.

---

Then why did you react the way you did, if Rufus didn't say anything snide to you? Just curious.

Quote: Sanguine wrote in post #10

---

Then why did you react the way you did, if Rufus didn't say anything snide to you? Just curious.

---

Zitat

---

Rufie, please refrain from answering questions specifically addressed to me.

You have trouble enough answering questions directed toward you.

---

Uhh, Cedie

As I was initially invited to this board, and thus far the invitation has not been revoked, I will post whenever and to whomever I please.

Thanks for your concern, though.

Another thread successfully disrupted and hijacked.