Quote: Cedric wrote in post #25

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #23

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #21

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #17

---

You're fine with the big government elitists in the GOP.

Good to know.

---

And you're fine with anarchy.

Not good to know.

---

Your accusation is unfounded.

I believe in limited government as designed for us by the Founders.

---

The Founders advocated the Rule Of Law.

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #7

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #6

---

Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #5

---

the House ought to...defund the entire mess.

---

That would spell political disaster for the GOP (which is undoubtedly why you're advocating it).

---

You think it is better that the funding continue and this monstrosity go forward as planned? It could very well be the final blow to our economy. It is devised to undermine our rights and our economic welfare. It could potentially harm future generations in horrifying ways in ways that have never even been considered because of the inability to frame, manage and control this nightmare in its beginning stages. Any and all measures should be used at every opportunity to stop this. Anything less is unacceptable.

---

Quote: conservgramma wrote in post #15

---

Personally I don't care how we get rid of Obamacare......defund or repeal......it matters not.

So long as we ultimately rid ourselves of this monster!

My two cents.

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #35

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #31

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #25

---

The Founders advocated the Rule Of Law.

---

Have you noticed the Jefferson quote within my signature, yet?

---

Have you noticed that TJ has credibilty issues, yet?

"The liberty of man, in society, is to be under no other legislative power, but that established, by consent, in the commonwealth; nor under the dominion of any will, or restraint of any law, but what that legislative power shall enact, according to the trust put in it."
George Washington

"A government of laws and not of men."
John Adams

"Those who advocate the lawless defunding of Obamacare would most ruefully decry the anarchy begat by such a precedent."
Cedric The Great

---

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #37

---

A plagiarized quote from Slate dot com, a well know leftist organ?

Figures.

---

It is still the law of the land, dummy.

It really doesn't matter what any of us think about it. What matters is if the GOP should try to defund it (yes) and if the USSC should allow such a thing (probably).

I don't really see why the House should be forced to pass any new taxes whatsoever. They're lawmakers and other than the Constitution, they have no bounds and shouldn't.

In the end, the GOP really has nothing to lose and everything to gain. I wonder if our gutless turd leadership will give a damn.

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #6

---

Quote: algernonpj wrote in post #5

---

the House ought to...defund the entire mess.

---

That would spell political disaster for the GOP (which is undoubtedly why you're advocating it).

---

We knew that there would never be any de-funding when Michelle Bachmann got kicked to the curb by the GOPe House leadership as soon as the Boehner house convened in early 2011. There was $185MM that she had targeted right off the top that would have effectively stopped it in its tracks. Regular Order of the House could have easily denied the Authorization necessary. But no, she was told to sit down and shutup!

Quote: Cedric wrote in post #42

---

Quote: Palinista wrote in post #36

---

So Prohibition, even though bad law, should have been upheld by the USSC because it was written by the legislature according to you. Law is law. There is no such thing as bad law in the imaginary world that you live in.

I didn't realize you were a supporter of the Temperance movement.

---

Deartest Queen Of Nonseqiturs,

Prohibition was imposed via the 18th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, not via congressional legislation.

In turn, amendments to the Constitution carry the same legal weight as the Constitution itself and are, thus, not subject to reveiw by the Supreme Court.

Face plant, indeed.

---